RE: External Project Validation & De-Risking10 Dec 2025 17:45
Munchkins
Everyone's got losses on their Books or in their History. I hold 2 Stocks that i can say are Terrible, ones I bought 3 years ago in belief of UK Tech, and innovative company's and Solutions. Both the Company's and UK funding initiatives are Diabolical.
One i have made a fair bit of Gain on, but now on a re Entry have found myself holding the Bag over a year now. And the Amount of Third party news, loosely related content and attempts of promoting them as a sign of what's to come has become Tediuos to the point its just "look, this is doing this so Β£1 by Xmas type of Stuff".
I don't mind Manlord highlighting Tronox Deal, but on reading his post i think it was just overkill. Like it confirms, validates and means what here excatly? Yes, i get they do Titanium, but they are not receiving a cash injection for that its for an already established Rare Earth Set up thats in the front and Centre for funding Currently.
Ok, it confirms funding is available in WA, but we know that right? I mean Tim, knows that. But we keep looking at this as Rare Earths play, consistently trying to assign it to Critical and trying to third party what others are doing to validate here.
This should and will validate itself, and perhaps we shall recieve the funding necessary once we can further prove up the resource, complete the flow sheet and production plan and have something that needs injecting. But its all still further than you think.
People take my critique the wrong way, like Doc!! The moment Doc starts providing actual debating content then ill likely either agree/disagree with him.
But im not holding my breath so ill just reply to his wise cracks and insults