Member Info for Dustyslay

Yes, but I'm not happy about it. That .26 average just got blitzed to bits!!!!

Some pictures 🤣🤣

Whatever floats your boat cheif, keep your fantasys to yourself tho castle

Wish you would, fook off on the Broom you rode in on, back the Oz dorothy

Yes agreed 100%

We need more challenges or what we doing here, sleeping on the job.

It's all good having Manlord tell us he has spoken to his mate Shaun, and relays the message it's ok, trust in what I say, and I've just topped up the umpteenth time.

But I like a second opinion once in a while

Well happy to hear your good, now do us a favour

Get investing

Said live from the basement......

.....in his tin hat

Tronox is an interesting one, having an operation in the proximity of pitfeild.

So the facilities of similar exploration/excavation are there in nature.

So more to an end if his argument

Well let's hope your intentions are Honest manlord, as I've not hidden my somewhat dubious feel to your posts after your outright challenge of my suggestions I past, and my downfall with many board members as such.

I'm all for an opposing argument as ghenghis has pointed out, and they have added credence to there arguments each time.

Mineral sands although swiftly rebutted by Shaun, pretty fast, almost like he reads these boards, doubtful. Had merit, as through my own investigation was spotty. Happy it was cleared up

As for the new poster, also his facts are based on truth, but also the misconception it will be deemed not viable, as on my own investigation there our plenty of written papers with a more positive conclusion, this is Australia not Brazil.

When you use the words WE, when referring to Empire raises a question who is we.

Shill by definition of the Oxford dictionary im short, can be used in some circumstances is such:

The person or group in league with the shill relies on crowd psychology to encourage onlookers or audience members to do business with the seller or accept the ideas there promoting,

All being said, I'm fully invested here regardless of this board or members and come here to convey general market sentiment. The facts are out there for all on your investment. Without the board

I'm under the assumption you have filtered my posts silverside.

But as I've noted, his argument has truth to it, but from a minor stand point. His link can be rubettled but opposing articles and journals that prove the extraction process.

His accusations smack that of a bad actor, along with his timing.

His tactics are one of the assumption many posters do not have the adequate intelligence to investigate such claims as they seem too technical to challenge. And that they await such posters as Manlord or Ageos to confirm.

That's a dangerous thing in itself

Personally I don't trust none of them.

Lovehandles as his argument was abrupt and bot sincere.

Or Manlord, because he is too pomp a hypocrite. That he complains about the boards non informative posts, but does nothing to squash his argument but offer a passive lording over it, signed off with a love letter and personal tosh.

Which apparently we can't do, but does willingly.

So between the deramper and the Shill, who knows. I pay attention to neither, and neither should you. Do your own research!!!!

Ageos I won't complain about, he is neither ramp or deramp, offer opinion or encourage, just factual information for you to read and reinvestigate. That's nothing to be suspicious of.

I'd never trust an opinion of someone who was 92% down and refuses to hear abstracting opinions from posters, that's not to say he is what they say. But I take it with a pinch if salt

Green energy hydrogen fuel hub which is under planning and development.

This is down on the website as located within Pitfield. Does anyone have any information on its progress, parent company etc.

With the kind of tempatures some of these extraction processes will require high levels of energy and keep the lights on.

I only ask, as its highlighted on the website under the pitfield project I'm assuming it will be of importance.

Wanna know if that bad boy is up and running and get jacked up to it

Https://www.sphinxsai.com/2016/ch_vol9_no4/2/(483-491)V9N4CT.pdf

Here is an extraction method proven from samples taking from Indonesia.

Have a nose over

Fully tested

Fully proven

As Shaun Bunn had said, it's a unique find and game changer. The study from Brazil our poster linked was 2019, and wasn't conclusive I'm comparison.

Titanium isn't a rare find in itself, its more common than you think but not always commercially viable due to complications of extraction. With presence of other minerals prevalent in the compound causing problems ranging from colour disfigurement, right up to complete reduction of the ore compounds. Unviable.

That's what is going to make this unique, and will have published reports and studys provided by geological professionals similar to ones in Brazil 2019.

I'm glad I took the time to bother, not that I needed. I'm in for the win regardless

So basically,

The first bulk of samples from the first set of diamond core drill programme have done there test work.

Specific test work includes:

Mineralogical composition and size distribution

Communition characteristics

Gravity and magnetic separation

Floatation

General leach characteristics

The second bulk of diamond core samples, have been sent for a similar metallurgical testing similar to the above but concentrating on the top surface covering 1.7m to 10.7m deep.

These are deemed the highest grade, and have extensive weathering to the point the samples have reduced to the 2 purest forms of rutile/anotase Tio2 that they believe has become an easy route extraction due to the forementioned extensive weathering.

Although his science is correct, his facts are proven in most common areas of localised samples taken from Brazil, China. The levels on those areas have proven to have had a less weathering effect as to reduce the presence of iron.

I unfortunately couldn't locate manlords table of elements found I'm samples by percentage. But by memory the iron was only minor prescence.

My conclusion is, this will all be in the June presentation. I see plenty of reason to see we have viable grades of rutile/anotase to produce quantities of extensive value. And with the work going into studying the effects of the weathering effect, is solely down to the composition being unique to other studying in sites located in other regions.

Just for you ghenghis,

I shall investigate this personally.

Fully aware of bluejay and circumstances surrounding it.

And I shared my thoughts on the matter then.

It's overlooked.

But I'll get back to you, as his post has truth not all titanite being commercially viable.

But incorrect in there being no commercially viable market for the compounds in the report.

You buy that in powder form at its purest is one market.

So your in?

Good lad

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Stop it!!

Made my Friday that

I think, well I recall December it was that was a real tough point for these and when I put down my 1k, was when there supplier for the equipment went into administration and delayed there progress, opting for a Chinese import took this 6 months, which in all fairness I recall they said as such, 6 month delay. So I look at that as an honest opinion and one that has now come to pass, I avoided the Bridgend cash raise as I jumped out a week prior went it went from .77 to .5 on opening and the news along with it, it blindsided me so I saved myself a very big disappointment as it never recovered till this News of collaboration with Australia.

I suppose what I'm saying is I'm torn, and probably not fully give up here but playing it smart.

So if it does hit 1.3, I'll add to my 1k

Https://uk.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TECHNOLOGY-MINERALS-PLC-129457850/company/

Simples

Sad you need to research it to consolidate your weak position on your investment