Member Info for Dustyslay

The removal of 50% is not because of RR, there phenomenal I certainly believe £8 is achievable and I'll just assess it at intervals as I'm way above my original target of 3, then £4 so it just keeps going.

It's external factors that cause concern.

But to have a crazy stake in this is tempting beyond, unfortunately not being able to get indepth knowledge here the past 5 months on the BB.

I've taken the opportunity to research the azz of it to the point of obsession haha

Just a few key info left to tick off, and I'm all in!!!!

I feel the same way about you

That stirring the pot this morning, one thing about Liverpool is shyte stirrers like you, do not belong

Yessssss, cev I'm tempted to sell 50%

All my investment here was funded by RR, but on extraction proven I see this as a better place to invest.Im only in till £6

Then I appreciate your input and queries if in fact it is your profession and professional opinion.

I like the notion that you believe that with such announcements that the proof is being potentially sat on, the reasons is up for debate.

But I can sense your intrigued and hopefully your answers be met, and you invest.

Come back when you are, as to offer credence to the investment

As I get older I see the infrastructure old and new, the contrasting buildings it's immense the view on the Docks these days.

Yes red my share count isn't what it was, its funded a lot of ventures these past 12 months. So I have reduced my holdings to reduce risk, and maybe could have kept it higher, but that's the price of chasing glory I suppose

Real question is, are you invested?

Next question is, will you invest if such things are proven?

And last but not least, do you think this will bring enough traction, for you to buy in lower?

There is truth to your post I'll give you that, so it's hard to articulate a sufficient argument to your point. And it's almost as difficult to offer a direct comparison to the find. The Brazil one for all its uses, was heavily introduced on lower grades and less weathering and not an abundance of rutile/antase presence. As I read the results in full.

I think personally, with enough going on, the sp reflects the mood over the past 12 months.

And once your disproven, it will move up to levels that were looking.

I mean if your buying new tech and engines for the future, I'd just keep that, it's served me well fir over a year now

Red, you not think RR be hitting £6

Come liverpool Castle, night our here, change your life mate!!!

If we're going to be a player in this industry

Better to act it, than to allow competitors access and diminish our perceived capabilities.

It's about image, let them come begging!!!

*hold a strong hand.

These tests and results are taking place which will also be part of the weathering publication I'm assuming.

All provided by EEE, by experts across the field.

Similar to the posters link of published report from Brazil 2019.

It would be nice, but the intent would look like offering them an advantage over competitors who have kept a close eye on proceedings.

Best done in house to keep our options open and good a strong hand

I don't think we can fight there interest off forever that's for sure 💯

Kongolesse,

What's your take on those things happening.

A poster mentioned the fact that processing plants on location of the mining is pretty rare, he said there is none. But it's not far off, if these company's have the man power and facilties to do as such, would it be in our interest.

Or we adamant we can turn an exploration company, into a full blown start to end producer of titanium.

And how long do you feel that would take? And at what cost?

You should post more

Then I can post less

Thanks fella, it's important conversation to have.

It allows members of the board a more detailed version of what process we're facing, and the stage we are at.

And reflects the market to help onlookers understand the sp performance off the part horc publication.

And it helps my fractured mind from months of arguing with people to have someone just answer back without per judgement and rises above it.

Look forward to speaking down the line.

GLA

cue the harrasement, but I got what I came for

Just seen the news.

Big thanks to castle for his huge contribution to the funding of Bridgend.

Getting to we're they are, on the backs of the livelihoods of the common man.

I can't stand your smug ceo, pulling it off hook and crook, white family stooge

Aquinaga,

I get it's exhausting for you, it's just as much for me.

But I don't get a lot of opportunities to learn about other points of view from investors on here much so why a person who isn't rude and offers such, I'm hoping to take that opportunity.

If you want me to respect your request, first respect mine please.

Then I can just go about my day without hassle

Yes I'm aware of that, that's why it's a guesstimate not an accurate publishing or breakdown of its content. And more drilling taking place.

Do you have any rough numbers yourself, of what you feel could be extractable levels of the compounds we need for valuation?

I seen the comparison company from the other day, reading 0.5 rutile and there market cap was staggering with much less tonnage.

Sorry I'm not a complete expert, hence why I come here for people like yourself

I think the levels have already been established prospector, allowing the first part of the jorc to be published given a guesstimate amount of tonnage from the drill samples, 3d mapping and magnetic radar showing the whole area to.be identical across the plain area.

How much of a percentage that will turn out to be of value once testing has commenced with, will determine a value.

Hence market reaction being flat