Upsidedownman - fair points to which I have no disagreemnts.
1984 - yes, but ctag site is not a bank, it's a defunt company website using wordpress (one of the most exploited CMS's in the world). Not applying security updates is negligent.
No.1SS: Maybe. Depends who registered the domain (agency or amit) who has control. Can't argue either way.
Seethruwall, thanks for the education on "how it works". I'm sure you know best ;)
You're assuming the monies (potentially) owed are for maintainance, but what if it's for a larger sum, say for the full design and build (maybe even for two websites, remember the onitor site?). Having worked for an agency many times, I know this is likely a 5 figure sum. By the way for "maintenance costs" of £300/year I would expect my site to at least receive security updates at the very least - just sayin'.
Anyway, I'm not here to argue the finer points - I'm merely pointing out a smoking gun. You can all draw your own conclusions.
Yeah, I think he messed up with that one post. All the others have been by the Admin account.
Hahahahaha, fair point AIM4. As I say, just a theory - thanks for pointing out the obvious flaw. Unless instead of trying to tarnish Amits name, he's using the updates as leverage? I dunno mate, maybe it's nothing...
website is using wordpress v6.0.1 which was released in july 2022 so the agency isn't doing a great job of keeing it updated.
my guess: amit didn't pay them, and alexander is ****ed off about it, so he locked amit out, and has been publishing these updates to tarnish amits name.
just a crazy conspiricy theory - but the only one with any evidence so far.
Correct Upsaidedown - now why would an employee of the agency that built the website be posting updates?
Anybody know why this guy is posting updates to the website?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ahawkingsbyass/?originalSubdomain=uk
The update on the 12th was done using his account.
So this has gone on long enough for me. Viewing these updates in the context of every other share I have ever owned just looks like complete BS. Imagine this was happening to a share you were not invested in, and you were looking in as an uninterested party - what would you think?
My bet is that the website is not being updated by Amit, but rather somebody on this board, and I predict that on xmas eve, or maybe xmas day itself they will reveal themselves in a glorious self-gratifying statement saying "Look how easy it was to fool you all". All under the pretence of "teaching us a lesson".
All the updates so far have been completely unnecessary and served no purpose whatsoever, other than to keep people on here arguing.
Just read what you're supposed to believe.... the deal is being renegotiated??? After it's supposed to be a done deal with monies already paied into escrow. Really... what value could possibly have been added as the "tech" has already been transferred to the buyer.
Red flag after red flag. Delay after delay. Sorry everyone, but I'm out. Good luck.
"any additional funding required by the company will be via cash or equity." It's in the PFS under section 12. Financial Analysis where they also detail how they arrived at the SC6 price. Worth a read.
Could somebody please confirm I am reading this correctly.... the RNS states:
"The Current MRE is based on approximately 56,500m of drilling" --- so the MRE is for only 56.6Km of drilling, yet there is a "surrounding 560km2" of undrillled area???
Does this mean these results are for approx 10% of the area ALL have to explore???
Figures and Tables referred to in this release can be viewed in the PDF version available via this link:http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1699U_1-2021-12-1.pdf
1 hour 20 minutes in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alJdRU7U2yM
"Pretty Damn Good" technicals
Just sayin
Welcome back brother ;)