Member Info for dunderhead

IMHO (and is absolutely only that) such an option would not really work unless in a really interim basis and with new (board) blood as well.
The whole BOD should take responsibility for this mess (but will they?), as this is exactly why we have a BOD - to keep the CEO and company strategy / risk profile in "check".
Hopefully some positive corporate news soon?
Regarding revaluation of company post wressle on stream, depends very much on oil price which ain't looking too clever at the moment!!
Best of luck all and as ever, imho and dyor.

TAC, as far as I'm aware Paul set up the company or was an original founder and that fact should always have been appreciated. He got "sacked" too quickly imho and Hugh was put in who again imho, did not have anymore convincing experience for running plc at that point in his career and the rest of BOD probably not up to "scratch" either.
I am under the impression rightly or wrongly Paul was treated with disdain I.e. now we've got a real team in place to take EOG to the required level?
From day one I was very personally concerned about the Irish focus/ bet but at least had the comfort of the UK producing assets with the idea these would not be ignored or expanded upon like EDR however as time progressed I was proven wrong which was why I became more vociferous with regard to "strategy".
I just think after Paul "left" company he was left high and dry with no communication about strategy or request for feed back on direction ?
I just get that feeling and was posting in response to H's suggestion he could hold the wheel temporarily or even permanently again? Ie that it wasnae that amicable a "divorce" and a lot of the original BOD are still there?
As ever all imho.

Judging by some of his posts on here I'd say "they" paid him no proper respect at all with regard to communications or inputs?
Purely a hunch on my part and of course my opinion only.
A lot on here seemed quite rude to him as well. Funny how opinions change eh?

Good old IOG mgt.

Which proffers the question why on Earth did "they" get rid of Paul after such a relatively short time when they gave the Hugh so long to really f up the company?
All imho of course.

ADNA I'd say i know just as much as you me old mucker unless you're an "insider"? I am aware of the (potential) productivity of "competitive" blocks. But of course the pos/cos of inishkea is so so compelling that in how many years it hasnae been farmed down yet?
Has it occurred to you this is just a subjective analysis and other oilers who may have looked at it may have adjusted this in line with their own analysis?
But boy oh boy just because eog and their third party QC, attribute this pos /cos it's got to be (gospel) right hasn't it?!
Tell me again buddy what exactly is it you do for pay?
I'm certainly not saying it will not get farmed down, because if I didnae think it wouldn't I wouldnae be here however, to harp on and on about a number (ie pos/cos) as if it is as certain as dying and that is the only dominant factor in determining whether to farm in to an asset, is a teensy bit naive isn't it? Serious question buddy?
As ever all imho and dyor and best of luck to all holders.

PP makes you wonder why they havnae farmed into inishkea doesn't it?
Perhaps, just perhaps, there are other assets equally as compelling to drill maybe even with a lower cos/ pos bwtfdik?

CP you are of course very correct. I didn't dare mention that issue as would have got accused of de ramping "good" news.
Let's hope this kick in the bottom / political carrot is a pre cursor to Government moves so AEX don't need the begging bowl again.
Best of luck all and as ever all imho.

Crusty. You had the patience of an angel buddy.
Imho, very interesting rns today especially in how it has been written.

For crying out loud CP where is this detail validated by senior govt rns?

Apologies last message from me directed to CP!!

I'd go by what was in the RNs which gas obviously been written in full co-operation with APT and u think they "may" have mentioned it lol!! As I say a very very dwerky remark but no problem.
I am surprised at the "strength" of the message in what was released.
As ever all imho and dyor.

Crusty FGS man please NOT the list!!
Good to see vindication of the many hours of your time wasted "back then" lol.

Cperkin do you really seriously think after that rns APT have seen the PSA?
Lol talk about a "dwerky" remark??!!

Tac you seemed to be implying a new CEO would help the "current" malaise? (although from my view, this "kind of" started with Hughie coming on-board some years ago and isnae a current issue really?) You may take the mick but I've been right to date, especially when I dared to question certain stooges excellent best ever ever research on here - currently latest benchmark "research" to compare to, is that new CEO will triple share price!
I personally felt what I was saying was pretty obvious then but got shot down by every one for posting it?
As I don't even understand cos / pos just please ignore me matey and put me on filter perhaps?

A new CEO cannot work miracles , simple and, I personally would expect the mkt to value any appointment accordingly. I hope we don't get a consolidation and placement with new production purchased but perhaps this is the best way forward for possible short term share price uplift?
If we can wangle some decent production, essentially paid for through acquisition, that would be great but, I dont think there are many opportunities available anymore? This could change with potential oil price weakness brought on by possible world economy and corona virus hysteria but if not, things are probably going, at best, to stay the same or, get worse before they get better?
Very best of luck to ALL holders, as ever all imho and dyor!

Christ on a bike Tac. The "damage" is not being done anymore by "current" BOD than "last"? They let Hughie continue with his "strategy" / PR and negotiations, way way too long did they not?
Why do you expect things to change quickly?
The only thing that will get this moving is increased high margin production and a farm down with a drill date imho.
I believe dreamy knows of a (top top secret) ceo who was going to triple the share price (at the time) upon appointment so that should be quadrupled soon hopefully?
Of course I don't appreciate the meaning of cos so wtfdik though?
As ever all imho and dyor.

Apache posted more sensible posts on here than 95% of others.
Hi RoJo by the way.

Upomega me old mucker. Just my own personal experience of marginal smaller type fields tend to get smaller than originally prognosed and larger fields tend to get bigger.
Also one f up on the appraisal drilling fs the economics big time.
All imho and dyor of course.

Interesting 're i3. For sure rre better fit but as I say 2p of stranded oil often gets smaller rather than bigger.
All imho and dyor.

I certainly hope "we" r not involved with i3e!!