Member Info for DSFLAT

Jamboner,

The Earth is now supposed to be an oblate spheroid, a little bit chubby around he middle where it supposedly spins at 1000 mph lol

I'm saying FG doesn't present himself or any information distributed by QBT in a professional manner expected of a CEO let alone a Professor;

PRN

15 November 2022

Highlights#

Preliminary results of Machine Learning Method “B” indicating 30% improvement over commercially available ASIC chip-based miners (which mining rig specifically ?)

PRN

10 May 2023

Method B, has theoretically increased the rate of successful bitcoin mining by 2.6 times compared to standard bitcoin mining industry practices widely used over the same time period. (no mention of ASIC in this PRN ? why no mention ? )

PRN

20 October 2023

In addition, QBT has revised the Method A and Method B product descriptions on its website, by stating that they are now available as a SaaS platform (Software as a Service) and have added two animations visualising the data obtained by running Method A and Method B on its GPU testing platforms in time lapse. (GPU testing platforms ?! What happened to ASIC mining rigs ?)

No mention of any specific metrics used or the specific mining rigs used for comparisons ..?

How vague can a company be when they present results to the market ?

The results are a joke at best and an obfuscation of the truth at worst...

I was surprised to hear FG mention Bitmain having 80% of the Bitcoin mining market in that latest PR X video (not BitMan as Jamboner thinks it is lol)

There are so many questions about what QBT actually think they have because FG has NEVER given clear details on test comparison results as in if ASIC miners were even used when the Method B jumped from 30% chance of a win improvement to 2.6 x in tests.

I was surprised because Bitmain mining rigs don't allow for firmware upgrades and have locked this down for several years ?

Building Tools for Bitcoin Mining with Jan Čapek CEO Braiins (WiM331)

2,305 views Jun 27, 2023

https://youtu.be/p9TKc7zfkaU?si=_OjgFYAk_sNisO-0

I'm still of the opinion that QBT may have seen improved wins using old GPU mining metrics but will be unable to translate that to new ASIC mining rigs.

Braiins have been there and got the T shirt:

https://braiins.com/pool

FG might have something but it would be beneficial to discuss the issues rather than the constant pumping nonsense we've seen on here everyday for the past two years

No proof of concept with ASIC Bitcoin mining rigs (tests on GPUs over a short period)

No Deals announced and only speculation on IF anything works on ASIC Bitcoin mining rigs and has any economic value if used in a mining pool

No reason to believe QBT have anything of value

imo of course

BobsSocks, One immutable ledger for the world

Bitcoin (but not the small block Cabal bitcoin version;)

The concept is already out there with Gate2Chain and Trace (I believe IBM are involved with BitcoinSV on this project)

Digital twins and product ownership guarantees for life

https://www.gate2chain.com/trace

Probably a bit ahead of itself but I imagine everyone except Jamboner and Suthy will get it ;-)

If you didn't have any stock tokens locked others would know...

They could discard your intended influence because you have no stock or in this case Bitcoin

If the post gets pushed down the rankings you can search Bitcoin on-chain posts here:

https://www.hodlnet.sh/

Search for 'Jamboner'

Jambone has been made immortal on Bitcoin Block #816752 :-)

Trending on www.hodlocker.com with 1 Bitcoin locked for 1000 blocks is:

Jamboner is an idiot

(posted because I just shared with UK share chat LSE;)

It's on-chain forever lol

Anyone can post on www.hodlocker.com and have their post timestamped On-Chain for free.

It's a new bitcoinSV app or website where you can lock bitcoin to a duration of your choice behind your post or any other post (redeem your lock and lock again, cash out. or go buy some stuff) and just post for free as anon all for free.

There is already a separate search website and developers seem to be drawn to this new concept.

It's unknown how something like could affect trad social media like X, Redit, FB, search engines and even AI which has already been shown to be bias toward MSM mind control NLP.

Take a look, say what you want on there for free and decide if it's the future of social media content (when it has sub categories) or it's just some Bitcoiners playing with a new toy

BlackRock ETF application: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1980994/000143774923017574/bit20230608_s1.htm

They did their homework, discuss not having to choose the Bitcoin fork with the highest spot price, mention Craig Wright UK court cases that start 15th and other points that ruffled some feathers.

it's a tough read but intriguing

Fleccy or anyone who is invested in Bitcoin should read The White Paper, then read the Satoshi emails and then read the Satoshi forum posts before having an opinion on Bitcoin.

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/

BTC isn't Bitcoin

BANKS Hijacked Crypto - Hidden Puppeteers Exposed (AMA with Kurt Wuckert Jr)

39,104 views Feb 19, 2021

https://youtu.be/5pHGi0nQMqs?si=SxUs87GaLb8oVKHi

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, until they made it small blocks, took away some of the original code, added new code so that Jack Dorsey and Co could implement Layer 2 payment rail Lightning Network which has now been exposed by a lead dev leaving saying it has security flaws and doesn't work properly...

Worth watching that video where Kurt exposes Davos, Epstein, Mastercard and the Cabals involvement in controlling Bitcoin/ BTC

There is a long lag on any BTC/Crypto posts (this happened on the main site some time ago but wasn't fixed on the Crypto pages imo and I have emailed LSE about the issue so people can interact quickly on the BTC page.

Speaking of long lags what happened to Jamboner ?

Jeez all he had to do was research MARA and post his speculative calculations... lol

I've posted something about the BTC Lighting Network on the BTC LSE page..

It might be worth a look

https://www.lse.co.uk/crypto/bitcoin/

& yes it's SHA 256 related

Jamboner, you shouldn't just copy and past other peoples calcs..

It should be easy to look at MARA's numbers, share your calculations and let everyone discuss.

https://www.mara.com/

Other miners would have to consider setting up their own Pool to get a true reading which whilst not beyond the realms of possibilities can lead to irregular results and rewards as MARA experienced for a few years.

https://mempool.space/mining

You can work things out for yourself I take it ?

'Total flake with zero credibility'

I'm one of the few posters on the BTC LSE chat lol

I'd say that at the very least deserves some degree of credibility ;-)

https://www.lse.co.uk/crypto/bitcoin/chat.html

Jambone "Numbers are massive"

Numbers are misleading....

Most BTC miners use a mining pool and contribute hash to the poo. Rewards are then distributed according to hash regardless of how many BTC any one miner 'won'

Using this model IF QBT were to deliver a proof of concept product (so far only GPU testing animations and nothing on ASIC compatibility) any miner who risks their fleets warranty, mining uptime and long term productivity would be simply contributing to other miners rewards IF Method B works.

MARA have their own pool so perhaps do some calcs on them before coming up with stupid massive numbers.

I would add that I doubt MARA would risk their entire operation until long term proof of concept, a 100% guarantee of zero downtime or potential deterioration in their current production were achieved.

Do the math on MARA Jamboner and lets see what you come up with...

https://mempool.space/mining

https://www.mara.com/

Pip13 dyor and don't listen to the rampers on here. FG says one thing and they interpret it as something else lol

https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/articles/francesco-gardin-of-quantum-blockchain-2-million-fundraise-will-fund-the-company-through-to-revenue-211c4da/

I personally wouldn't take anything FG says as anywhere near the truth. He has been guilty of so many false statements over the past few years they are almost impossible to list lol

In that interviews FG says de er, de bulk of the £2M will go towards building the infrastructure but that isn't what the RNS stated lol

How he gets away with the everchanging stories is baffling to me, especially after he hung investors out to dry on that last stunt.

Oh & try Brave Browser if your fed up with the ridiculous amount adds on this site ;-)

A reminder that FG is crafty with his choice of words. When he says the placing should see QBT through to revenue I suspect he is referring to the court case monies rather than any likelihood of revenue from a miner or a product being proved up commercially.

I imagine FG will be enjoying a very large Turkey this Christmas with that BeeKeeper chap who pops up when it's time to pump QBT whilst the pair of them joke about the Turkeys that fell for the Method A, B and C stories.

Like I said he's as crafty as they come