Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Interestingly, it makes reference to non-laboratory testing, which was the next phase of their bio marker study. I wonder if new data is going to made available? The implications of this test are insane. Home and primary care testing during the COVID pandemic demonstrated to the government the potential cost effectiveness of testing which requires less resources, in this instance the massive false positives of using CT scans.
I think it was bouncing along with trading? I was tempted to sell as it hit my 20% threshold but I bought into this as prospective of the results from the research being conducted at the University of York. Links on the Cizzle website. I’ve read the CV of the principle investigator and they conduct very good research and report on their findings as per schedule. Preliminary data from other associated studies seems very positive, I’m holding until the publication of the more recent project, then the company can make money. Rishi Sunak recently spoke about home testing for cancer (not sure we are quite there yet) in a recent press conference, reassures me the bigger players will buy and take this to market once a higher power of data is there.
Don’t let this go to your head, but your posts are one of the reasons I came back to this stock after my stop loss kicked in. Really very helpful answer, I’m type 3, partly because I enjoy the story and feel a bit like an explorer. I need investments like this or my portfolio becomes just about money (definitely have those in there) and I like to feel like there is an element of ‘hobby’ and learning in my investing.
Thank you for taking the time to compose such a thoughtful answer.
This is a genuine question. Why isn’t there more interest in KAV?
I recently bought back in and after seeing some pretty (what I thought were) positive RNSs the price is still stagnant. I’m not necessarily guided by money, I like learning in tandem with my investments.
I have been doing my own research, mostly based on some very detailed analysis from members on this board, which feel very informed, credible and not at all rampy, or otherwise.
Just curious about what I’m missing?
I’m going to stay invested, I have a low entry, like Ben’s approach to public relations and communication and think maybe it’s just market sentiment hindering prospective investments?
The board requested the administration. After months of me thinking they were nefarious, I’m changing my mind. They must know the business is profitable, they have engineered themselves into administration, to prevent a fire sale, to have a formal and thorough appraisal of their assets vs liabilities and to ensure any offer is based on this this fair assessment.
If they wanted to sell assets cheap, they could have done that already. They still might sell, but this protects against unreasonable offers.
Clever board.
Good article. Because of my profession I’m more conversant with the research aspects, than any business aspects. But, I feel very confident having delved into the research collaboration underpinning this project, and recently bought back in.
The potential is massive, the test isn’t just about making lung cancer more accessible, but reducing the need for CT scans, expensive and with high false positive rates. That’s huge, not just economically but also the impact on staff resources, patient outcomes and hospital capacity.
I’m -32.56% @2.01p average, but I appreciate you are suspicious of anyone on this site. I feel this share will rise again quickly on good geopolitical news. I’m just saying a prediction of 41% isn’t credible in the current situation.
I think those inflated predictions are clickbait for share sites.
Bought back in today, couldn’t resist. Going to be a long term prospective hold for me now.
Never seen this much about #KAV on Twitter!
I liked how Ben and Paul seemed very amicable in their references to the agreement. Very credible.
The academic investors would be all over any hint of impropriety. We have really strict ethical responsibilities, governance and reporting related to our standard operating procedures and associated research grants.
Nope. Nothing here. Just saw it had changed format this morning and everything had disappeared. Even when I searched in the LSE chat search bar it didn’t populate with the usual Raven Property result, I only got here by searching in Google. I’d written this off ages ago but still incredibly frustrating.
Agreed and fingers crossed. I’m angry at myself for getting greedy on the last two spikes, no one to blame but myself.
As a compromise maybe just one saying the financial report will be forthcoming. Or the banking arrangements have been sorted for the export licence.
Give us an off ramp please. Or maybe you know we don’t need one ????
Please and thank you.
As others have said, the amount of money is relative. Furthermore, if I had of put £500 in, then I would have had three opportunities over the last few weeks to trade and make a nice profit and buy in again at £500. As it is I have been greedy and missed my selling point twice, which I shan’t if I’m lucky enough to get another opportunity.
I think BT was Tweeting with the intention of maintaining the integrity of his company? He is clearly putting much effort into communication and the public face of his company and probably aware that inferences could be made about noticeable larger scale coordinated shorting. Also, if you read this board the share has clearly got a very rational sensible core following, so he’s probably aware of that and wanting everything to remain above board. I’m new to stocks and the KAV LSE board is quite notably different (sensible) compared to other shares! I’m mainly here and holding because of that and the very interesting discussions from members like KeithOz.