Member Info for Dreamboatwarrior

Red I’m pretty sure they do want it …. Just think they wanted to help themselves rather than pay up for something that’s been put on a plate for them.
The most resonating comment for me was
“This is a case study for junior miners as to why you wouldn’t want these guys involved in your project”

Full takeover in my opinion RK

Medi ….. I tend to trust gamblers a lot more when they stand to lose their own money …. These guys certainly do . The point I was making is any bridges with BHP and NCM are now irrevocably burned, not what would give you the confidence to do such a thing?

Medi too late now for reconciliation
“BHP & NCM can go f**k themselves “
Followed by
“It’s all about taking these big companies down and embarrassing them”
Really hope they can back up this stuff ….. it’s like trash talking before a boxing match …. It fuels the fire

Q good points well made ….. you didn’t comment on why they would consistently vote with an entity hell bent on getting the company for as little as possible therefore rendering their own shareholding much less valuable?
As for evidence there will clearly be none for obvious reasons, but let’s leave it here

Tesla …. Either way you have to admit it’s fascinating watching this unfold .

Tesla you may be right that’s what opinions are all about. You posted something about me putting inflated target prices on this …. I’ve always made a point of not guessing at eventual prices so I’d be interested to see where I did that? Having said that I do believe we’ll end up way north of where we are now … this looks all set up for a plain and simple takeover to me ….. of course there are risks and nothing is guaranteed but I like the odds …. If you don’t get out ….. assuming of course you are invested?

By the way if there was manipulation, when there is low volume would be the easiest time.

Q not looking for a quarrel it’s just what I believe…. Answer me this why would Blackrock consistently back BHP knowing they do not represent the best returns for shareholders…. Surely they want a decent return.

“ While there is no suggestion of collusion, BHP, Newcrest and the funds management giants BlackRock and Norges Bank are perceived by most observers to vote the same way on most matters at SolGold. Collectively, those four owned about 36.5 per cent of SolGold shares before the merger with Cornerstone”
Why would Blackrock vote with BHP if they wanted the best return on their money ….. it’s fairly obvious to me they’ve been complicit in share price manipulation for some time.

I guess every buy requires a seller

Makes sense but those late 1m’s look like buys based on prices quoted during the day

The people behind the royalty have a direct interest in Solgold via a large holding in CGP ….. it’s stabilises the price and eases pressure at the AGM whilst sticking two fingers up at certain shareholders who thought we were backed into a corner…. Let’s see if and where these shares are placed

Financially I’m guessing it makes (tax) sense to sell the whole lot, but an immediate deal from something Mather led to pick up certain licenses would mean most got what they wanted.
Add …. For Sangha to come out and be so brazenly ****y he must have a deal in mind for at least Cascabel…. Which could in turn flush out another …then who knows

Morning Add …. Re your earlier post I can’t help thinking DGR may have a part to play here even after a takeover. I can see them used as a vehicle to hoover up some of the unwanted licenses from the new buyer ….. maybe even prearranged? Nick would know which ones he wants …. Then we can all embark on another 10 year odyssey lol

Scree grab whilst you can

Mathers
It’s all still there on previous page
It’s very long

Mathers it’s a paid for article they clearly aren’t happy

And not a mention of JV’s in sight

Sharket these guys all stand to lose loads….. I’m sure they already have something in place