RE: Why do I read the markets know something?27 Aug 2022 13:46
HarChris, the reason for the change is the £20m on the trade receivables that will be cancelled off. I missed it from the accounts that the full disputed amount is £155m not £135m (that's just what we owe them in cash)
So whilst we will have to pay back £86m if we lose the bod don't think that we'll be able to pay that back immediately as clearly due to investment costs, working capital needs, LTIP and IT-IS reducing the cash balance below £86m.
However, it is likely that the government will agree to a payment plan as we will be able to prove that we have at least £40m due back from HMRC (£25m VAT and £15m Corporation Tax, although corporation tax may be more). I also think that the judge will push for a reasonable payment plan to be agreed.
Therefore without M&A we would likely have say £40m left in cash after full settlement and a 3-6 month payment plan.
JM won't want to commit too much of that £40m to M&A so id expect no more than £20m being ringfenced for M&A.
If in 12 months we have settled the dispute and spent £20m on M&A and assuming the business is net zero cash flow then we'll have £20m in the bank and have net assets of around £100m. By then sentiment should be more favourable as dispute will be behind us, M&A helping to improve revenue and bottom line and our own portfolio hopefully will be generating sales. That improved sentiment, even if it got us back to a NA value would put the SP at £1.50 ish.