REMINDER: Our user survey closes TODAY, please submit your responses here.
Most investors had already moved on from the Ctag series 1 episodes that were all centred on the Onitor & which was then deleted from the UK market listings.
Some at that time then persevered in seeking claims of fraud whilst the rest of us had indeed wrote off the Onitor.
Fast forward 3 years to December 2021 & several Pi’s were then awoken to the Ctag series two episodes with a ‘deal having been reached’ centred on SaaP & DaaP.
Then in 2022, notice of publicised ‘deals for Ctag commodities for $275M’ which then brought all the players back to the table.
‘If you don’t think it’ll pay, just move on and forget about it.’
So that then appears to be a core tenet of Wokiestan fundamentalist policies ? ie. anyone that disagrees with ‘us’ are to remain silent and then if our philosophical thinking pr lack of , is then found to be incorrect, we can ‘simply forget about it.. just write it off’.
Which some would argue is the most cowardly commitment of all.
Less of the negative vibes with those ‘please stop goading’ as the reality can often be far removed ; the ‘goading’ is likely centred on a targeted audience who don’t post their notices on this bb. And it is then just purely coincidental that some external notices get promulgated.
Thank you Helx, Ive just caught up with your ‘evidence’.
It is appreciated.
Im’ still though extremely sceptical on Amit’s abilities, as per the catalogue of improprieties that i then ‘evidenced’.
Fingers crossed that your faith “payout to arrive very shortly” then gets rewarded.
Impulse Dynamics was co-founded by Shlomo Ben Haim and Lewis Pell. As per Shlomo’s wiki- bio.
Care to provide evidence where it then states that Amit Ben Haim has an input on this ?
The strongest evidence as ever with ABH is again somewhat lacking. & the evidence, the available body of facts, is then what ?
So okay, you are suggesting those previous consultancies inclusive of the latest, SB Corporate Finance Partners Ltd, are then deemed sufficient evidence of entrepreneurial achievement ?
With brother Shlomo being a Tier 1 status entrepreneur, an A-lister in the business world, as evidenced by his Wiki bio :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shlomo_Ben-Haim
& its single reference to their joint collaboration on Bio-Sense, which is now deleted from Amit’s only available bio, better summarised as an entrepreneurial Tier non-existent, as per cloudtag.com
A bio nonetheless that can be found on company check where it shows 8 resigned directorship's (many in partnership with Sabine Ben-Haim) & of 5 dissolved directorships.
The only pertinent evidence then being that less than gratifying reference to Amit on Shlomo’s wiki bio.
The counter argument is flawless in its rationale, it simply takes into account ; the website statements & Amit’s past record.
More specifically, the 100% total lack of any verifiable substantiation supportive to the validity of any of the claims made on the website statements in addition to the 100% total lack of accomplishment for any website statement that is then centred on proposed actions &/or their targeted dates.
More specifically, Amit’s past record as a proven bad actor, as highlighted by the Judge & as shown by the FCA approved NOMAD’s refusal to allow him a continued UK market listing.
In addition to Amit’s hazy past record which now sees any reference to his alleged previous single successful enterprise done in collaboration with Shlomo, now being deleted from his bio.
Is more pitiful than frightening. Obviously this is then just an opinion.. Reasons and evidential justification ? & allow me to explain :
She had again re-contacted me 8 weeks ago (copy & pasted onto her yesterday’s deleted thread) after a peaceful hiatus of 3 years and it was simply a “sigh” that i then let out. Her arguments as highlighted per 21:41 have always been incoherent. Mixed with her regular dyslexic inputs these then created a very tiresome effect, where it regularly takes time and effort to try & decipher her posts. IMO then and still is now, she was best ignored.
Her opening message 8 weeks ago was highlighting her new bb ID & of ‘a need for a new platform to air her story’.
Her 2nd message was then two weeks later to enquire why i had gone silent. This was the effect her previous history of incoherent posts had on me.
Pitiful indeed was the woman whose family had lost significantly due to their belief in ABH and at 1st i thought ‘quite plucky’ looking after her family interests. But after her performance (or lack of) it soon became apparent that her arguments were no longer welcomed by those seeking any sort of resolution to the ongoing ABH charades.
Pitiful is the woman who then started to troll my posts when she was politely first told that her own posts were illogical.
Pitiful is the woman who then opened yesterday’s thread which was entirely centred on trying to flame me.
I’m an auld fashioned guy and my focus is on ABH so i don’t take any prisoners. I simply gave her both blasts of the barrel, naming & shaming her, such that she then removed the thread that she had created. No apologies for the lack of remorse in calling out pitiful.
There is a time for balanced perspective and then eventually there is a time for totally focused actions. Hopefully Admin will now delete this thread such that we can all wait quietly for the next instalment of ‘your cheques are in the post’.
Hopefully Helx can indeed enlighten and give some rationale behind his magnanimous thinking towards ABH’s recent endeavours.
As it currently looks, there were what, 5 missed dates each being advertised as target dates for payments and then subsequently all were missed [$/£ conversions, etc]
With the alleged ‘apology’ then arriving in the same notice as the blame for delay being courtesy of a miscalculation from a UK broker ? Again conveniently, very magnanimous!
Would be interesting to hear something more substantial than ‘i feel it in my water’.
So, it looks like another thread is about to depart,
courtesy of the open-minded, balanced, humble folk.
Lol.
of all the foolish statements aired today, that surely takes the biscuit ?
‘..humble folk trying to do their best..’
============
trombone. @. neilgollygosh. apr 26
#ctag hey schlomo ben haim, what's it like having a ****** for a brother. absolute ****** and your family name getting dragged through the **** too
=========
lol but guessing there ain’t going to be much left of that ‘humble’ message..
“I happen to think the narrative that he's told us in consequent updates from the time rings true..”
Flawless in its total lack of rationale.
Proven by the judge as being reckless with the truth, proven by the multiple notices as also being reckless with the truth, But…. hey !
‘I now feel it in my bones that ABH has turned the corner..’
Interesting perspective Hex.
It is perhaps relevant to what is now occurring Antha:
There’s very clear history of reneging on owed accounts.
The probability currently exists that are funds held on escrow or with the agent (slightly higher than 50% imv).
Most sane peeps are all asking why therefore the recurring blatant excuses.
The finger again points at ABH’s mind-set.
(rather hoping that Shlomo may have said a word or two)
Lol, but just a wee bit excited to see what Friday pm’s notice centred on ‘your cheques are in the post’ will now be.. ?!
“agent’s engineers will commence this evening with opening the portal that will allow all Pi’s to receive payments on an equal footing within 14 working days..” ??
Lol but really fail to understand why todays peeps find it so difficult to call a spade a spade. Thankfully the judge had no such qualms.
Case Number : 2207514/2017
5. The claimant chased the payment and received reassurances from the company that they were doing their best to pay. // .He was not told about the time limit.
6. ….
7. As a result of chasing the respondent the claimant received email from the Mr Ben-Haim on 1 August and saying “your payment has been processed and will be with you shortly”. This turned out not to be true.
Signed.
Employment Judge Wade on 22 January 2018.
=====
So….A fairly consistent pattern then of “your cheque is in the post” ??!
(Presumably you meant) post ‘..not contacted or not paid anyone..’
which then relies on an alleged deposit which may or may not be held by an agent or held in a bank in Chicago and whose only existence has then been supported by the many Ctag notices, which have then been consistently proven to be reckless with the truth.
Consider that in both payments, the funds have been released by the clients.
The SaaP has cleared escrow & is allegedly sitting with the agent & the DaaP “had” been cleared for payment ‘’by end of week 16th October [2023]’’.
And it was NOT the client but ABH who then opted to delay, allegedly for extra %.
That these funds had allegedly been cleared, means there is no sitting requirement for NDA’s pertaining to the clients previous requests.
So over $275M has been spent and yet to date there is not one single peep of acknowledgment, not one single listing anywhere, not one mention that these 2 clients had then purchased 0.25 of a Billion $’s worth of commodities ?
Anything is possible in this game bud. IF things do go well here, we are looking at a further shares rinse.
Not sure which mouth would be the most vulgar:
with TW you simply stand back a meter and then take note of his counsel.
With ABH you will then immediately ask for a second opinion. Both need rinsing with carbolics.
Lol but i have to ask bud, were you a COPL shareholder?
Your argument (albeit a lot lot more coherent than those coming from the whine o’clock club) is very reminiscent of COPL bb’s ‘death throes’ arguments : Put simply, they ignored every one of his warnings and went even further, suggesting the man was.. well, a complete loony.
Then after the fires had extinguished such that only scant evidence was being procured, they then all amusingly squealed ‘send for Tom.. where’s Tom?’ !! [i kid you not, unbelievably this actually happened].
The prospect of Tom entering a burnt out building which some might argue, he had set on fire (figuratively) would be quite silly, on a par say with arguing with a drunkard ??
But.. perhaps though helps explain why ABH keeps sending out those nonsensical updates…. Darn. You might actually be on to something there bud.
Nonetheless, he is seriously rattled about any association with his reputation & that ‘3rd party’ :
“..For the avoidance of doubt, I will also not hesitate to take any action necessary to protect my reputation against the serious harm that would be caused by the making of false and defamatory allegations to third parties…”
With the latest excuse for non-payment of the debt owed [income or dividend] now being centred on new-found ‘book discrepancies’,
It then opens up a wonderful new line of enquiries into the FCA vetting processes.
Of how an alleged responsible person of a UK company eg SB Corporate Financial., can then be accredited as a Money Laundering Reporting officer, ie. a person competent in assessing external in-direct probabilities, when that person can clearly not keep clean records of internal directly owned, company issued shares.
No wonder, Shlomo is now threatening legal action with those who attempt to associate him with this debacle.
Courtesy of the twitter crew, it is Interesting that Shlomo now states :
‘to protect my reputation against the serious harm that would be caused by the making of false and defamatory allegations to third parties’
which can be interpreted as stating that Shlomo now believes there could be serious harm to his reputation with it being alleged that he has association with Amit Ben Haim ?
And now we have their previous ‘partnership’ being removed from ABH’s bio.
Suspecting that the only notifications that we will see of any value, will be those coming from Shlomo Ben Haim.