Member Info for dominicusbenacus

@grenshaw

Here is my narrative:

Harmless comments (maybe from an oddball but still harmless) were deleted.

A possibly valuable debate (I described what this means earlier) was shut down on arrival.

The impression of selective information sharing and censorship remains.

A healthy community will implicitly determine by # likes and the amount of comments whether a comment adds value.

@greenshaw

:-) lmao -- I am asking again. Are you from Agronomics?

Your account is created today and all three 4 posts are on the LinkedIn comment matter.

Do you purposefully use communication techniques such as framing (more ... this time ) and repetition ("more accusations without any substance") in order to put the other person into a labeled corner?

These are just classic rhetorical tricks that are usually used in an attempt to control the narrative after an event. Good luck doing that.

Well now, I highly suspect, not saying ;), just suspecting, that you created the LSE chat account today in order to control. Your strategy on stressing/making up the "no substance" aspect is at least a strong indicator of "media guy" playing defense ;-). Not saying that you are --- not that you accuse me of accusing you of anything lol ;-).

You really made my day more greenshaw.

@greenshaw

lol- it's good to have one person in the room who owns reality and determines what reality actually looks like in this case. "Everything is ok". Thank you for comforting me.

The fact that you have only 3 total posts on this form and all 3 are from today makes me wonder whether you are one of the agronomics media guys, trying to control the public narrative :-)?

But I don't want to assume and therefore ask instead.

Are you from the Agronomics campaign?

@HermanusInclusus:

Whether it is running in the right direction is first - an independent question, and second, as far as I am concerned, you are not the last one who commands what people and members of this forum bring to the table. Aren't you? Did you try to regulate your underlying emotions?

To both of you: are you consider yourself skilles in CAT -- Critical Analytical Thinking and like a valuable debate?

Then, finally and to quote Adam Grant:

"Thoughtful disagreement doesn't start with "You are wrong!" It begins with "I'd love to understand your thinking better.

Attacking conclusions closes minds. Asking about reasoning opens them.

Good debates don't have winners or losers. They have everyone more informed"

And thats what was prohibited by deleting comments that spark a valuable debate.

You are cute but unfortunately miss the point beside the fact that non of the comments, including my own, showed any sign of violent communication patterns or unfounded claims. Sorry.

My first two comments that have been deleted asked the simple question "Why are comments deleted?"

Then I took screenshots and communicated that I took screenshots of the comments. Then a single comment as an answer to Agronomics answer on my comment has been deleted.

Then I commented the following comment including a screenshot of the previously deleted comment.

"The fact that you again deleted the comment of a critical voice is concerning to me.

My thoughts go like this:

The general meeting comes up and I repeatedly called out the topic of mistrust that has been building over time.

Mistrust is created when words don't match actions as represented by An announced but never implemented share buyback program, announced but repeatedly missed product lunch, repeatedly publicly stated under valuations of SP but no single high conviction buy of insiders nor any share buy backs on company level -- rounded up by company structures that are in-transparent.

Now, the cherry on the cake is the recent RNS emphasized on the importance of IR -- and PR campaign -- rolled out by "professionals".

Can you let people decide on the importance of using the "like button"?

importance of using the "like" button?

If you censor harmless comments, then I am wondering what else would you hide?

My conclusion and after observing all mentioned on top of the contradiction between Mosa Meats current oversubscribed Crowd Funding round (less favorable investment terms) while blaming Marco Env for low SP. Plus LL didn't move the ANIC SP allows the question whether Agronomics has a Trust issue after all?"

Every single listed issues that builds mistrust can easily be proven by a simple Google search, checking RNS and what then happen or didn't happen.

The original comments of Henri K. Whether eligible or not we're deleted. My comments asking for the reason was deleted. These are all harmless comments and if anything, then a platform is supposed to make all voices transparent in order to clarify misconceptions and increase understanding. Deleting comments is like shutting down the opportunity for everyone to gain Intel and increase comprehension on the overall topic.

After My recent comment where I call out the bad move of deleting critical comments and the topic of mistrust that has been build, Agronomics deactivated the comment function completely.

One still can react to my comment though.

Check it out here

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:7292477085908914176?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28ugcPost%3A7292477085908914176%2C7292576748309749760%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28ugcPost%3A7292477085908914176%2C7292945325118357504%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287292576748309749760%2Curn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7292477085908914176%29&dashReplyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287292945325118357504%2Curn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7292477085908914176%29

Deleting harmless comments. What else do they not share and selectively hide from us.

This is unbelievable.

After all this is representative for their attitude towards the public. Being very selective with what they want to public to know.

Mellon purchased 1.3 million shades for ~60k

I really don't know what I shall think of this, relative to his wealth and current stock, tiny pocket money purchases shall signal. It just feels super twisted to me.

It seems the Agronomics responsible shut down the comment option. This is really bad move.

What do you guys think of the comments on latest Agronomics LinkedIn posts?

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/agronomics-limited_agronomics-executive-chairman-jim-mellon-activity-7292482041701359617-lgo-?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Had the same impressions these days regarding the suspiciously high supply.

What do you mean by "MM"?

How do you guys interpret the RNS?

Also, regarding time line:

"The project continues to make significant progress with its build programme and expects to have the facility complete by the end of this calendar year. "

It seems the struggle to raise funds delayed the time line. Originally, first quarter of 2025 was targeted to be fully operational. Now it is only end of the year and only finished building.

I guess together with many other missed deadlines, this represents one of the major reasons I am annoyed by management.

Actions doesn't match words.

Where did you get this from? That they plan to raise capital?

@Peterrr Did you ever write down your concerns as profound "critical analytical thinking" argument, send it to Agronomics email, and put it on the agenda for the next shareholder meeting?

I didn't get it on wallstreetbets due to strict community policy for post and some rules.

But I got it on pennystocks

Check out my post and engage as much as you want:

https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/comments/1hbzqw1/agronomics_the_contrarian_yolo_to_stick_it_to_big/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Hello TEam,

I created a informative post for the reddit r/wallstreetbets and r/pennystocks. However, due to my unsufficient karma, I am not allowed to post yet.

Is anyone able to post in the mentioned subreddits?

I would love to send you my ANIC post to spice things a bit up and still post this message on these two subreddits.

Feel free to text me on reddit user: u/Maleficent_Click_450

Anyone who has plenty of reddit karma to his account?

How to promote more meme is the question?

I don't have a bigg follower account lol.

I would love to supply the meme momentum in order to turn this into green zone.

Currently, my Avg. Share Price is 6.1p

Lets see maybe Elon Musk soon jumps on the train and crashes it down instead of up :-)

I would rather have loved to see Liberation Labs following through on all levels and, causing a substancial runup

p.s. Perplexity AI's USP is referencing all sources and quoting them. Therefore the answers I posted previously on common questions are a rather valid summary then "hear saying"

It was just very cumbersome to share, including all links and sources etc.

I asked that, given all the information provided, would you invest in Agronomics?:

Answer:

Yes, I still believe investing in Agronomics (ANIC) is a viable option, despite the current downward trend and associated risks. Here's why:

--- Long-term Potential: The cellular agriculture sector has significant growth prospects, and Agronomics is well-positioned to capitalize on this trend.

--- Undervaluation: The stock is trading at a substantial discount to its Net Asset Value and intrinsic value estimates, suggesting potential for price appreciation.

--- Portfolio Strength: Key investments like Liberation Labs show promising progress and strong market demand.

--- Analyst Confidence: The consensus "Strong Buy" rating and high price targets indicate professional optimism about the stock's future.

--- Upcoming Catalysts: Potential near-term events, such as Liberation Labs' funding round closure or facility launch, could quickly reverse the negative trend.

However, this investment would be suitable for those with:

--- A high risk tolerance

--- A long-term investment horizon (3-5 years minimum)

--- The ability to withstand potential further short-term declines

The current downward trend and sector risks make this a speculative investment, but the potential rewards could be substantial if the company's strategy succeeds. As with any investment, it's crucial to size the position appropriately within a diversified portfolio.

HINT: This is in the end a composition of many sources but please don't take it literally. In the end Perplexity as well as all other LLM are based mostly on intepreting existing information and calculate probabilities of word orders :-).

Found it fun to chat with Perplexity AI about ANIC though.

Maybe you also wanna do it and share.

I asked perplexity AI and had a long conversation on Agronomics and perplexity provided some great meta summaries that I want to share in some posts:

Question:

everything considered, what is the probability to close the round successfully before end of the year?

Given the latest information available, the probability of Liberation Labs closing its Series A funding round successfully before the end of the year appears to be moderately high, estimated at around 70-80%. Here's the reasoning behind this assessment:

-- Progress in Funding: Liberation Labs has already raised $3.5 million via a Secured Promissory Note in October 2024, including a $2 million investment from Agronomics. This demonstrates ongoing investor interest and confidence in the company.

-- Strong Market Demand: The company has signed letters of intent with potential customers representing over 200% of its launch facility's available capacity for the initial years. This strong demand is likely to attract investors.

-- Government Support: Liberation Labs received a $1.39 million award from the US Department of Defense for a feasibility study, indicating government interest and potential for further funding.

-- Construction Progress: The ongoing construction of the Richmond, Indiana facility, supported by recent funding, shows tangible progress towards operational goals.

-- Investor Confidence: Agronomics has increased its total investment to $19.6 million, holding a 37.5% stake, which signals strong belief in Liberation Labs' potential.

Funding Target: The company is aiming for a $75 million Series A round, with an intended minimum of $37.5 million in "Qualified Financing."

However, there are some factors that could potentially delay or complicate the funding process:

-- Economic Conditions: General market conditions and investor sentiment in the current economic climate could impact fundraising efforts.

-- Time Constraints: With only a few weeks left in the year, the timeline for closing a large funding round is tight.

-- Complex Funding Structure: The mix of equity, debt, and potential government investment might require more time to finalize.

Despite these challenges, the strong market demand, recent funding success, and strategic importance of Liberation Labs in the precision fermentation sector suggest a favorable outlook for closing the round, though it may extend slightly into the new year if not completed by December 31st.

I asked perplexity AI and had a long conversation on Agronomics and perplexity provided some great meta summaries, I want to share in some posts:

NAV and Financial reporting Standarts -- Any flaws and misconduct etc?

After a critical analysis of independent sources and Agronomics' own reports, the gap between NAV and stock price appears to be real rather than a result of flawed NAV calculation. Key factors supporting this conclusion include:

- Consistent NAV calculation methodology following IFRS standards

- Regular independent audits by KPMG Audit LLC

- Compliance with AIM Rules and QCA Corporate Governance Code

- Transparent reporting of portfolio company progress and valuations

- Market sentiment and macroeconomic factors affecting smaller holdings.

However, the subjective nature of valuing early-stage companies in an emerging sector like cellular agriculture introduces some uncertainty. The persistent discount (68% as of September 2024) suggests market skepticism about the portfolio's true value.

While Agronomics' NAV calculation appears reliable, investors should consider the inherent risks and potential volatility in the cellular agriculture sector when evaluating the stock.

Was their historically any sign of financial reporting issues?

Based on the available information from the search results, there are no indications of Agronomics facing historical financial reporting issues. The company appears to follow standard reporting practices and undergoes regular independent audits:

Annual Audits: Agronomics' financial statements are audited annually by an independent accounting firm, KPMG Audit LLC6.

Regulatory Compliance: As a company listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange, Agronomics is subject to regulatory oversight and must comply with AIM Rules for Companies.

Corporate Governance: The company adheres to the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA) Corporate Governance Code, which is appropriate for smaller listed companies.

Audit Committee: Agronomics has an Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARCC) that oversees financial reporting, internal controls, and the external audit process.

IFRS Compliance: The company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union.

The search results provide no evidence of past financial reporting issues or irregularities. The company appears to maintain transparency in its reporting practices and undergoes regular scrutiny from independent auditors and regulatory bodies.

Can anyone provide a link to this Luigi's post where he mentions ANIC or AGNFM?

Where do you trade this stock? AGNFM?