Member Info for djwall1s

Or we could just wait and see what happens instead of tying ourselves in knots and hyperventilating.

Just chill out.

I agree Oiltap. If AIM companies worked in such a way that put their retail base on the same par as they do their institutions and City pals, then maybe we'd see more pi money stay in these companies instead of flying in and out, gambling just to break even. The emphasis should be on helping small companies grow, but where anything to do with money (and a lot of it) is concerned you have big sharks moving in who now use many sophisticated techniques to empty pockets. Much of it is by wearnign people down with endless flatlining or declining sps, like we have here. Huge drops on a handful of sells and paltry rises numerous big buys.

It's not right.

I didn't say I was embarrassed of the specifcs of EUZ's work. I said I was embarrassed of AIM as a whole. But when I say it my posts end up getting mysteriously removed. (For the record, I'm stuck and just waiting to get out of AIM, and won't be investing more money here, ever).

People like you, Oiltap, are very thorough and often quite easily do a better job of promotion and explanation than the companies themselves or those employed to officially promote them. Which I just think is a great shame. These BoDs make a packet and should be out there on social media being a good font of information (within rules). Many are, but many have little to no presence. And like I say, it's less about me not wanting to promote EUZ for its exciting asset and potentially good 2020 (all of which I've always agreed with). It's the fact that I don;t want to encourage anyone to throw good money away on a sp that is being bizarrely manipulated by big brokers atm with no sign of an end in sight.

Next year may be a different kettle of fish. I hope it is.

Sorry for typos, machine running slow.

Because I'm not going to promote a company to cash-strapped punter types which is beset by psychotic brokers Hunt and fatcats like Peel Hunt, who think nothing of stripping millions of a market cap in a day if it benefits their fat City pals.

I wouldn't shut about AIM at all on Twitter, in fact I'd keep quite out of embarrassment. AIM's general record speaks for itself!

It's just not a 'funny old game' sadly, it's a thoroughly vicious game and if people weren't hellbent on getting posts removed - warning about the dangers of throwing too much at AIM willy-nilly, as most newbies ed up doing, then there might be some level of balance on these boards.

Because in fairness to the BoD they have done what they promised and delivered Q4. People would have been rioting had they not. So they have stuck to that. And there's clearly more work to be done.

I think we all knew 2020 was more realistic for more detail on the asset and a potential outcome therein. But the troubling thing is the reaction to ANY sort of good news round here. It's almost maliciously bad every time. It doesn't help AIM in seeming an attractive playground for fresh investment.

*high teens* not nigh.

Hopefully we can cling onto the 20s though. Maybe a little rally but not expecting too much. Next year it is, then. Let's hope for better.

My guess is sadly, will end 2019 in the nigh teens. Market hates EUZ, for what real reason is difficult to say but it has been diluted to death by management. Warrant holders and Peel have been less than helpful and looks like all eyes are now on next year for more results.

The RNS was actually a good step, not to everyone's taste, but did not merit the stupid (though expected imo) drop this morning. I agree with others here, as I've said for many weeks, that the board of EUZ really needs to look towards proving up what is in their remit to do on this asset and offload it, let someone bigger and more powerful take on the costs.

This company and its shareholders cannot stump up indefinitely. Not when there's nothing to show for it every time. Cash flow is a concern (as for any AIM company) but the constant *******-kicks will ensure even new blood won't bother to come in because even rock bottom isn't worth it when it gets crushed lower and held then for long cycles.

It's genuinely as if someone really doesn't like this company.

Don't worry, I'm sure PEEL will be back to crush the living daylights out of any small rise we manage to eke out.

LR, thoughts?

Currently 0.26 to sell on HL.

The Scottish result is usually a bit of a paradox, though. The SNP generally sweep the boards but yet most polls (esp a recent one) seem to indicate the appetite for independence dropping away.

My guess is that there's far more at stake here than just independence where Scotland is concerned. They have a lot of very good, hard-working SNP candidates who fight the peoples corner well on local matters, and are trusted and voted in again and again because of local issues as well as wider affairs.

That's what I'm saying he did.

He told this board that's what he'd be doing, selling his holding in drips because it's so mega, apparently. That's his choice I guess.

Probably that Steve character, another one who bought far too many all hopped up on the hype and then said he was offloading his useless fortune, his personal broker (aren't they always) 'drip-feeding' the market over the next week. (Aka, internet self-execution service.)

Rather than, you know, waiting a short stretch to get (possibly, at least) few reluctant pips back from the Mets. Which is what you'd think people would actually buy in for. Having said that, who's to say, we could nosedive on the Mets and good old Steve had a lucky escape.

Even if we find the lost Inca treasures and half of Atlantis the mms will probably torpedo this thing anyway.

Thanks, but you just let us shareholders worry about any tick tock.

You go back to fiddling with your elastic bands and paperclips on your 14 yachts, moored off the coast of your imagination.

"is that a good word to use?"

It's a neutral word to use. Just another term for 'outcome'.

....and, to add, mms and bear traders playing the gaps in newsflow and delays. I have very little doubt that we'd be proudly sat below a penny if we were live. Even with all this progress and work, this ****-poor market would still only focus on the boxes that haven't been ticked rather than the achievements.

The marketing angle is a difficult one to pin down. On one hand it does feel as if they've been far too precious about getting Tally out there and building some proper steam behind this concept. It's almost as if they've expected everyone to blithely stumble across them, rather than plugging their concept beyond Twitter and Facebook.

But then, if App 2.0 IS the big cheese (and was always pre-planned to be), then maybe it's been sensible to raise awareness but not too much (and especially keeping it confined to the UK so far), because there was a new version coming and foreign markets were further off anyway?

I don't know, I'm not in their heads, and perhaps they have had their eye off the ball in terms of PR and the ground they could have gained. But you can also burn through a lot of cash marketing something that's only half decent. And there are obvious reasons why you'd be less keen on marketing your basic first version than a much more refined 2.0. All this testing on shareholders/small groups to start with might prove prudent in the long run. It's not as if we're taking a hit with the sp whilst all this goes on. We no doubt could well do if we were active on AIM. Mostly because of uncertainty.

I'd love to see us go to a main market listing. I don't know how do-able it is, but to get right off of AIM would be a relief. It's not the market it used to be. Most companies seem to be going nowhere on AIM nowadays no matter how good the news is, many just treading water forever.

Having a data room isn't 'price sensitive'. The only price sensitive info is what comes OUT of the data room.

There's simply nothing to report just yet.