Member Info for djwall1s

It'd be different if the financial legal system was on our side in the UK. But it rarely is. It'd be throwing good money after bad down a bottomless pit with no guarantee of any positive outcome, even when clear boundaries have been breached by a company. That we've been kept waiting 5 years+ means nothing to the cold fish in legal circles, because the company is still operating, so just sit and wait.

I love my country dearly but it's always been run on nepotism and corruption to some extent. We just tend to do our corruption in Savile Row suits.

These AIM CEOs know this and depend upon it. But the flip side is that we also had and have free choice. Ultimately it was our choice to invest here. CP didn't force anyone. It appears he was as surprised as us to be shut down. But then he probably figured AIMs barely-there safety net wouldn't ever catch LION out. It did and here we are. He's used the time out to reinvent LION as Tally, and parachute in a new team, look and website. He's stripped back some dead wood and has started to finally get rid of those mines.

To a legal beagle that looks like a company that's not struggling/is viable at present. They won't be interested in taking us on as shareholders.

You can look at it two ways, I think. Either it's another brutal can kick of a full 6 months (we all know it's not going to relist any time before the end of June and if he says June, add several months to that, naturally). Or, this is now a long-term prospect building up to something this year, maybe mid or backend.

I'm undecided. We are at least functioning so that's a plus.

'Yes from here, it look like late Q2 would be the earliest. It will take us 3 months (hopefully, but it may be up to 6 months) to get revenues through £1m on an annualised basis which is the minimum revenues we’re looking to IPO with. And in Q1 we should be finalising the sale of our Finnish mining asset - also important for the IPO story/focus. We’re also doing a lot of other things in Q1 and I’m sure the time will go very quickly.'

I offer no opinion. Just leaving this here from CP so that people can make their own minds up.

No it's not being stopped. Go to its website and read its RNSs.

Being a UK company hasn't saved shareholders from 5 years of uncertainty and stress. Company is operating so difficult to persue anything because our shares still exist.

Some years ago Cameron Parry did talk about an internal scheme in which shareholders could buy/sell their frozen shares back to the company at a discounted rate. But it never happened.

There is a shareholder here that has kindly offered to buy shares off of people privately and this has happened, but he appears to have reached his line in the sand, which is completely understandable and fair enough.

Basically, Mr Parry has, once again, talked the talk but not even begun the walk. It would be no surprise if Tally is still nowhere near putting together the listing brochure that they need to even start the process of application to the LSE. And again, nobody knows why we cannot just go back onto AIM. On the'advice' of a broker. Mr Parry was scared off of listing for the umpteenth time because a broker apparently went 'boo' and told him to do 'more metrics until at least Q1'.

That's terribly convinient. As we near the five year mark of shareholders being left in limbo.

And yes, it's still a good product. Him refusing to get us listed which is the best self promotion you can get, is the ongoing problem.

Same bb, let's hope for a better 2023 on many levels. Atb to you and yours this Christmas.

A LSE listing seems to me to be just a stalling tactic.

There was never any logical reason why this company could not have just simply gone back onto AIM and grown from there. In fact it would seem absolutely the natural and least time-wasty option.

There may be reasons why he was bothered about going back to AIM. Maybe he felt AIM had done the dirty on LION or figured LSE would be a more stable option but it's only business, and you can easily build up to bigger and better from AIM, whilst not needing half as much outlay.

PS: thanks for the earlier reply, bb.

See this is why there are so many narcissists in business and CEO-ships.

On the one hand they can say stuff like 'fiat money sucks' and 'we'll protect you from fiat troubles' with a straight face, whilst simultaneously withholding your damn fiat money from you for close to half a decade.

Chance would be a fine thing of actually having some fiat money to have such problems with.

The ???? are 'thumbs up' emojis BTW.

System can't seem to handle emojis at LSE. I liked that update, it was good.

That's how you do an RNS.

????????

You could put that to him at the next Q and A, bb.

Should have read... Why, do you think there's some significant news coming? Or just a hunch?

Why do you

https://adamcox.libsyn.com/405-cameron-parry-on-new-inflation-comprehension-research

... Or building a vehicle to allow current shareholders to internally 'trade', as he said he would.

Thanks bigbench. It's going to be one step forward and three back imo, because the company has to offset whatever it makes with paying staff and directors and running this swish office in central London. None of which are cheap. Unlike other small companies this didn't go to the wall during the pandemic.

We know some are taking some payment in shares but that doesn't put food on the table in a cost of living crisis so how much money is Tally burning through whilst delaying the listing another xx months down the line?

The advertising on Twitter remains pretty strong but again, few are looking at it, at least in terms of likes. Obviously expansion of PR may help a bit, as will jurisdiction rollout. I'm of the opinion though, that if he has time and inclination to sidetrack onto the latter, he could have sidetracked onto relisting this company already.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Togetherdec/status/1596548684812009472

https://www.share-talk.com/malcys-blog-oil-price-jadestone-energy-deltic-energy-europa-oil-gas-prospex-energy-finally/

Bugger off.