Member Info for djm1

Bought in now have you R88? Changed your tune....

Keep up Rob,

Lunn wanted 2-3p because thats all he could realistically manage through his channels, remember DL said they had offers above 10p, they could have raised over 1 million, didnt need it so 120K taken at 12p organised by Tom.

This book build is taking over a week, why? Why does the board have final say over who gets to participate? If not to control who buys the shares.

Is the placing in SH interests though? Do you know what its really for?

Try Buy why didnt you add Mooo Ha Ha HAAA!!!! to your last post? Pillock

Absolutely, why else do they post non stop.

Maybe intra day but next week was always most likely.

Still working, having to have the last word, whose retaliating now.

This will come good as you say, right?

There in lies your lie. Youre not here as some wonderful human being,youre a very polished very subtle fudder.

R88

Why? Why post on stock you dont hold??? Have you got nothing else going on in your life?

If the boss here was not confident of doing the deal why post on X? Its the fast track to looking like the biggest twunt on aim.

Hed be killing his own future and that of the company. He was involved with GGP and has brought good people on board, they wouldnt come if they thought this guy was full of it would they?? They know him better than you do and their judgement is more relevant than yours surely?

R88

why do you even care? What are you doing here working so hard? Trading???

Trybuy you are a LIAR. He said he was trying to get the deal done by the 31st. He was not definitive and you know it LIAR.

Why wouldnt they be?

TP, he may already have been approached.

There in lies the problem

Fraudulent misrepresentation is when a statement is made and the person making it either knows it is not true, does not believe it to be true, or has a reckless disregard for whether it is true or not.

If a director makes a fraudulent misrepresentation with the intention that the other party will act on it, and that party goes on to suffer a loss as a result, the director could face individual liability for fraud.

In fraudulent misrepresentation claims, the claimant has the right to decide whether to bring the claim against the company or the director personally. Often this will be decided on which party has more money - so if the company is facing insolvency, the director can likely expect to the claim to be brought against them.

If this is the case we may find out.

Gregorio, the assets are still there...

Which suggests Lunn is not being entirely straight either...

Tiger

he wasn't even working for the company at the time, have a look at the RNS announcing the date of the deal and when he was appointed!!

Tiger, Lunn hasn't been in the seat 5 minutes, the idea he did the deal from New Zealand is frankly silly, and as for DL he left because he couldn't give the company the time it needed as he was otherwise preoccupied with his new Bitcoin mining company in Texas, and he wasn't here more than 5 minutes either. Only leaves one person left. These are facts....

That is it NU? Dont let facts get in the way of a moody rant.