Member Info for Dip666

Talking of scousers - I kind of suspect you might be Derek Acorah reincarnated Ace ;-)

We could create a hybrid of Aussie Gold Hunters and Most Haunted visiting old mines and looking for ghosts?!

I could host it, get freddo along as the cameraman, you as the medium and get likes of Nine on as guests - we're onto a winner lol

So now we know who shot Skippy - it woz Ace!

I've no intention of selling my shares currently or in the near future based on my expectations for GGP. I believe we'll deliver positive updates that will bring more upside to the SP but nothing is guaranteed.

It is always good to take onboard lessons from the past and take a more balanced viewpoint when it comes to managing investment decisions as not everyone enjoys the same financial security and at the same point in life :-)

The most precious resource is TIME.

Once spent - never regained.

You might 'save' some at times but it still slips away eventually.

My late father didn't outlive his investment here, and many others also lost loved ones in the years that have passed us by.

I'd bet I'm not alone in that I'd give up every single share for our family to have more time with our parents as both sadly went far too young. You never know when your ticket is punched or those of your loved ones and there is more than one right answer in how to move forward with any investment.

So for those selling shares in future to help secure retirement that was less certain, pay off mortgages, pay for weddings and/or help family out with such matters - I'll celebrate you.

Nothing elaborate about common sense John.

The levels we're at now suggest to me a majority of LTH are probably OK now or nearly there from last few years as we get closer to £5 levels.

No doubt some are selling/slicing some profits or just happy to recover their money - and the insto's are more than happy to be picking up the shares.

Certainly some very odd trades suggest this process is become somewhat 'helped along' perhaps :-)

However - those who are optimistic that the upcoming updates will rerate the company towards ASX peers in the months ahead will happily ride the risk of awaiting this and putting up with the current under performance as you term it. We'll all have out individual strategies.

I have certain expectations in order to stay invested fully moving forward in 2026, if not met, I'll execute my plans.

The fact you can't recognise the need to earn this rerate as a new producer and entrant on the ASX, and are vastly overvaluing the company hugely at this current time suggest either an involuntary reluctance to face reality - or purposeful building of a narrative.

Either way - we'll all follow our own plans and I'll be riding this train as long as it makes sense to me :-))

@JB - You'll need to wait for the Hav/Telfer updates and then wait for the SP to react if the wider market appreciates and agrees over the next 6-9 months - welcome to investing in a growing and new producer vs an established mining company with years of performance data to analyse.

This is no longer a retail majority held retail company or indeed London centric in focus. Look at the marketing - Oz assets, Oz staff, Oz blah blah blah as the domestic nature of the company is a plus for ASX where attention is now obviously and IMO wisely fixed.

More and more the SP will react to 'news' if it delivers positively VS rises before 'news' from a mass of typical AIM punters then trading the spike.

Increasingly - what you have proved and accomplished to date and can assure technically in future potential through industry approved standards will influence the interest in the company from a more informed and institutional audience.

We're not Tier 1 shareholders whatever our holdings and average are here, we're riding the coat tails of the Big Boys forever more.

What was true before is not how it works moving forward and we have to earn our spurs on ASX - doesn't matter what we think we know about the assets, the market needs those shiny resource updates, studies and assays to prove it.

If we're moaning in a years time about being undervalued- then sure start looking at the team - you have unrealistic expectations of the SP currently though. The company needs to grow into those numbers you keep using, run some comparative analysis using the AI bot you obviously are :-)

And how many times do you want to cover a cornerstone investor also potentially being a threat?

Also par for the course in business - BUT to date nothing indicates they are up to no good. GGP wouldn't be here but for all those steps Shaun has taken - it would be another bloated corpse held down by rocks around it's ankles in the murky waters of AIM.

Appreciate where we are now - and where we might be heading as I posted earlier this morning- things could have been a lot different!

Not true Freddie for all of us- I think you'll find plenty of us aren't just in one stock at a time - I think that's crazy personally but each to their own.

More informed about our stocks perhaps though Freddo?

I thought Ed Mead was stating something in an interview about better grades than Telfer (current grades or former?),rather than Hav - can you confirm?

As Jerry said - do be a dear and let us know if anything decent turns up mate.

Some of us prefer post-discovery for less risky odds if it looks like a major Hav level discovery - even so - it will get traded and present decent entries.

Best of luck to anyone playing the odds post discovery - I know many have had a difficult journey there too.

There should be further improvement as the Hav and Telfer updates are shared and ignite further rerates into 2026, I am very optimistic they will be well received, the second part of the puzzle as such.

Currently, due to the lack of the above we also make a better target than many ASX peers for our shorting friends and to be expected. Still a young producer with a lack of historical performance and reliability and a as yet incomplete understanding technically of the future potential of both key assets in the market.

I've been there before getting too emotionally wrapped up in the shorters sheer audacity in picking Greatland and obsessively keeping a track on everything related to it via Ortex etc.

And we were also on uncertain paths as Newmont entered the fray while in the JV with Newcrest, we had a 'price discovery' that we were hobbled in with the option exercise but was continually reported as FMV in the media... It's been a tough investment us LTH.

But at this stage of the life cycle as a new producer, with confidence in the future Telfer updates and Hav DFS, I am a great deal more switched off and relaxed. Especially with the gold price also propelling the sector and likely to be a factor for a while.

No way I'm bothering staying up late following ASX or asset prices, it will all fall into place well within the next 6 to 9 months :-)

This is the part we get to start enjoying the journey again for LTH, and all to play out in months - not years... years of delays due to majority partners whims and unexpected corporate power plays amongst the majors.

Greatland is very much a master of it's own destiny now, plenty of challenges ahead but unencumbered by anything but it's own limitations and vision.

We should remember to enjoy the journey 😁 😜

Why you want E1 to pick you up some doughnuts for you Freddo lol

Cheer up mate, you're sitting on a decent profit surely now - considering your entries started in the 30's and you had to average down.

For all the lack of belief you have for Shaun - you still seem to have thought that things would work out.

Bow down to your messiah Shaun Golden Balls, enhancer of your early retirement as a former NASA Engineer :-))

*relieved

JB - let's be clear, I like to use a phrase...

'White Knight to White Shark'.

As any major investor is always a double edged sword.

They can help support you or destroy you - it's just a reality in business.

But worth remembering that if Shaun hadn't pulled in Wyloo and the likes of Gaines, we'd probably have been relived of our shares at around the price the deal was struck at.

A junior doesn't get to be a producer without major shareholders and funding partners, it is a risk that must be taken and to date - the parties have all been supportive.

'The market is always right' John B?

Short positions are not always correct, any more than trading and investing always results in profits for the professionals or retail. You were dead certain it seemed that the short position of Regal had appeared due to poor quarterlies ready to be announced weren't you? Seems you had that one wrong.

We need a couple more quarters of accurate forecasting and results, a HaV DFS and the Telfer updates to assure the market that Greatland has a solid base to grow from with Telfer while Hav comes online and they want accurate data and analysis to support this narrative.

Every organisation has common risks and opportunities and then those more unique to it. A new producer with a single operating asset for instance has certain obvious risks, more complex is the fact that there are both synergies and risks associated with processing Hav and Telfer ore through the same operation in future.

It's never black or white- but anyone who thinks that we should be rated 'fully' in line with peers at this stage of our lifecycle is clueless about investing and just lacks common sense. Could we be rated better, certainly and sure market players at times manipulate and cheat the system. These games are harder to play once a company builds a more secure foundation though - GGP have work yet to do in the next 6-9 months, which I am sure they will with aplomb.

The company is striving to increase the SP, through the forthcoming updates and day to day operations to maximise profitability. If you think that the management itself are colluding with certain 'forces' with ill intent then surely you need to consider an exit.

A DFS that analyst's covering the company suggest is inaccurate and unrealistic in the press would be very damaging to GGP - they'll release it when ready for Prime Time in Q4.

Quicker is not Better, only typical AIM punters chasing quick trades think in those terms.

I do feel that anyone adding their input into the community shouldn't be pressured into how they do so and anyone really interested in a local meet can put in the effort that SAB, Strudel, Rotherby etc. do to help rustle up interest and organise these events for Bamps. I believe a lot of these are weekends?... so if Bamps can give up his time - surely others can if keen to see his work?

One point I feel strongly about is charging folk for any community research, I always hosted a copy of my notes and other research independently on MediaFire as well as sharing on GGPChat as I was adamant that nothing I ever put together would ever ever be charged for. Had GGPChat ever become a paywall service I would have insisted the work stays free of charge or I'd have used MediaFire only.

There are many less fortunate in terms of disposable income investors hoping for some small success to get ahead in life on the markets on these boards - £50 is a lot of money to them and IMO they benefit the most from the kind of community effort we have here.

I think a better idea would be IF Bamps ever chose to go live as such is a set amount set to cover all his costs and venue if charging and make it voluntary donations beforehand - so all could pay what they can, I bet you'd always get the costs covered.

Also, once you add a commercial aspect to something, it gets complicated for various reasons - especially when dealing with investments. Keeping this no-profit as such is advisable for many reasons IMO.

Also - as others always share, I've always enjoyed meeting other shareholders at the Town Halls as always interesting to meet folk from many different walks of life and you find yourself chatting about other things than GGP or investing - its worth the effort if you can :-)

Just don't expect Ace to buy you a drink - or hand over that Driza-Bone he lost in a bet!

@Doozer - I believe you are referring to our friend Mr. Rinehart, the artiste formerly known as Acechaser :-))

Hi GerryJo - my post wasn't intended to criticise you directly, you're a good example of someone questioning the output based on your own understanding of the company if anything - no surprise given your background :-)

Shaun has his own theories and expectations for gold price which will of course influence his strategical direction for GGP- alongside the rest of the management team and board - who also may not always be mutually aligned in their views on such matters as gold price outlooks.

A responsible and well run organisation company always has to consider contingency planning and stability around their own products or services and the supply of materials and services they require in return to provide the aforementioned. So Shaun may well be very confident in his own outlook for gold price- but the way any CEO runs an organisation requires them to consider many different factors.

The puts aren't necessarily a reflection of his individual outlook and confidence in regards to Gold price one way or another.

I'm going to repost the information below from time to time given the growing utilisation of AI output in the investment community nowadays. AI is undoubtedly useful - but also anything but infallible. The quality of any output is influenced in the main by the quality of data sources, ability of the AI bot in selecting what it chooses to pull in and very much the ability of the user making the queries.

There are a huge number of very poor articles and 'analysis' online (such as by Simply Wall Street) for all stocks that are often utilised as primary sources by GTPChat and other AI services, resulting in the output often being somewhat inaccurate and misleading if you don't consider how you structure the queries and then verify the output (something many completely omit).

If someone has 30 minutes to spare, I'd advise them to run the queries below and let GPTChat tell you itself how you can make better use of it's capabilities, understand the limitations and guidance in improving the output when asking for information about GGP (or other topics).

1 - "What is GIGO?" (Garbage in , Garbage Out)

2 - Follow this with "Is your output infallible?".

3 - Then ask "Does Garbage In, Garbage Out apply to your Output?"

And lastly if the responses don't lead you in this direction anyhow...

4 - "Show how me how Garbage In, Garbage Out (GIGO) can directly affect a stock market analysis using Greatland Gold (GGP) as a case study" - you can customise this last query to the topic you are researching if not for stock analysis.

Useful Valmin Code Information:

https://www.ggpchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=132

Dear me - it appears much like E1'as PE post, my last post to the distractors hit home much much too close for comfort and has been removed :-((

They can get the posts removed - but our envious friends can't change what is happening.

Momentum is building, see you at the top :-))

Hi StuWoo - duly corrected for future troll bashing as they envy what they don't have of course, can't be jealous of losing something they don't possess -doh!

Hope all is well mate, hopefully catch up for a few beers in future to celebrate :-))