Member Info for Digitalis

You say Potayto I say Potahtoe - but basically we agree

Wookie, I've observed before that these types of contract take several months for the lawyers to bicker over every clause. We are just entering the window where pens might start to be put to paper, so we may see something this month or next month. I don't expect anything in December as nothing get's signed in December, trying to find a lawyer in December is enough of a challenge let alone get contract signed, so it will likely then be mid-January. I am confident though that they will be like London buses. Wait ages for one and then 3 or more turn up at once.

Well Jim, (there's a Star Trek joke in there somewhere) - I saw Wookie's post earlier (there's a Star Wars joke in there somewhere) but wasn't sure if I should comment, someone might misinterpret it as me trying to ramp (no) or short (still no, can't with HL and wouldn't risk it anyway) or trying to use my supreme powers of persuasion to convince (mature) adults to sell (heck, still no);

But since you ask, I would have said,

It is sitting at the bottom of the steep re-rate channel it created on the FEED RNS currently on a range of 82-89p as it is trying to cross the gap from the lower long-term trend it has been on since April which has it comfortably at £1 by New Year to the upper long-term trend that it triggered in May/June after the run of RNS and the Hydropulse launch and it was sitting happily in until SNAM exited, which breaches £1 at the end of this month.

There is strong resistance at the upper level around 94 p but a good RNS - sizable contract or Hydropulse contract would likely breach that and trigger a new re-rate breakout. Currently, it will either complete the cross to the upper trend or remain in the lower it is squarely in the middle of today. That has support in the mid to high 70s that I may have mentioned before, which it should bounce off before resuming the up-trend (might have bounced off today).

If there was a RNS that triggered the re-rate breakout, the, peak to trough of the W (double bottom) which is also a cup and handle, is 30p give or take a p - make of that what you will.

I would have said all that. But obviously, I didn't, as I would want my reading of the runes to manage the emotional reaction to a natural volatility drop (with 2 standard deviations of 30dma mean) to be misinterpreted.

Cheers Jim, Spock out.

DYOR etc etc

Well Dorset and East Yorkshire

https://ukenergystorage.co.uk/

Rough also a possibility and I' sure I saw something for Cumbria but couldn't find the link

@wookieemonster, you are echoing my sentiments I've previously commented. I think one of the most significant issues is the Treasury Green Book

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/the-green-book-and-accompanying-guidance-and-documents

It is not a mystery.

Morning Far2L8 thanks for the kind words. The matter is closed as far as I'm concerned.

Australia opens second round of Head Start program - 2Billion for large scale projects

https://asian-power.com/project/news/australia-launches-second-round-hydrogen-headstart-programme

Thanks Vamosbien, appreciated. Yes, I agree with you, it is the need to fill the void.

That is such a nice turn of phrase - I might borrow it :-D

Which post Lucky?

The one to MK3 - which was in no way different to every time the "nameless one" would post a "evidence in the share price, handshake deal hype over can't sustain the rise" type post - to which I would respond with - it is pulling back to the long-term uptrend type response?

Or the post this morning, saying look at this twaddle? What would you rather, I didn't post that BS article and wait until mid-day when the SP dropped from reaction to it (if it had)?

I don't have to admit it looked like any such thing as it wasn't. I cannot control how people choose to interpret things but it wasn't designed to do anything.

I have as many shares today as I did yesterday as I did the day before that and the week before that and the month before that etcetera etcetera. I don't expect anyone to react to the musings of any poster on here, I thought I had made that clear? I certainly don't think my posts influence anyone to do something and would never react to anyone else's posts - but I will have a conversation and I will seek to gain knowledge from others more knowledgeable than me and I will shoot down in flames the obvious agenda driven individuals who post rubbish (and did).

As Vamosbien said yesterday, if we can't talk about the sp and technical analysis here, then something is wrong with this board.

What about the 2 I posted yesterday? FFS.

It was the top new article when I opened the ITM share price on Google. And my mid-70s "maaaybee" was a response to Michaelkelly3 saying 60p as a pump and dump rinse and repeat - to which I clearly said no. And maybe means maybe in now way definite or a prediction. If you choose not to look at charts and analysis, that is your choice but the biggest risk to investing isn't other people, it is emotional responses leading to poor decisions. Failing to understand market behaviour to recognise a natural retrace after a breakout before the next move upwards can lead to irrational selling at an inopportune moment - I've made no secret of my desire to better understand market behaviour and chart analysis to interpret what is happening. Hence I will continue to post queries and my insights when relevant - in that case to shoot down an obvious shill.

Vamosbien's response yesterday merely validated what I was seeing in the charting - which is only probabilities. And as Is said, not about trading but about controlling emotions to what otherwise appear to be irrational market movements. I never said it would hit mid 70s nor that I wanted it to.

And that is the only time I will respond on the subject - you are filtered for a reason Troublesome with your paranoia and need to have the last word on every post. Ninette - disappointed

Bosys, the conventional wisdom is that they couldn't, there just wasn't enough volume, the moment they start to reduce the day traders will be all over the share like a rash and the squeeze will be on. They are now stuck in an ever shrinking pool of hope and desperation that the bottom falls out of the market and trying to stir up FUD. They are safe from margin calls for now, Qube less so but the time is coming.

The more interesting question is why they didn't choose to buy all of SNAM's stock when they exited - that would have got them out leaving Qube holding the baby.

You can always refer to it as Biological Solids as the water companies do, Kitesurfer

Https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/production/us-hydrogen-tech-firm-plug-power-announces-new-incoming-ceo/2-1-1882514

Thanks Vamosbien, that is useful - ITM is 7.99% of their portfolio as per latest monthly update available on their website

https://greenbenefit.com/en/fund/

So much for there not being any buyers as we kept being told

Yeah Bilbo, massive hatchet job - it is aimed at US referring to ITMPF so my guess is a US shorter - wonder who that could be...

Baaaa

It doesn't help when "analysts" publish this twaddle

https://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/article/marketminute-2025-10-8-itm-power-shares-tumble-a-deep-dive-into-the-green-hydrogen-giants-market-struggles

Markets go up and markets go down - it is still in the long-term up-trend. Looks like the retail therapy may have saved you a bit on the top-up

I would say so

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/ITM/feed-contract-for-120mw-uniper-project-cqsqsjsooqfhbns.html

I also disagree with the comment - I repeatedly used chart analysis to beat the "nameless one"'s stupid postings. Where have I suggested anyone should sell? Chart analysis is as much "know your enemy" Art of War as it is an actual strategy for trading

60p sailed a long time ago - maaaybeee pull back to mid-70s but a nice RNS at 7am and this flies