RE: BBC20 Mar 2019 08:52
From the article
"While freehold owners might seem exempt at first glance, they can still sign contracts which see them forking out annual maintenance fees for the upkeep of the wider, fledgling neighbourhood.
These "estate fees" emerge when a local council decides not to adopt the new area, leaving the builder - or more likely a third party management company - with responsibility for roads and green spaces.
Freeholders saddled with the charges say it's effectively a second tax on top of the one they already pay to local authorities.
They say it's doubly frustrating because the estate for which they pay a private company is nevertheless public space, which can be used by anybody."