Member Info for Devilbhoy

Believe!

No chance and no he doesn’t, as he has previously said there would be no placing and then almost immediately there was a placing. He has virtually no credibility. There in lies a lot of the problems.

CoplHodler

1. Only an idiot wouldn’t assess the factors you state should be dismissed and are only mentioned by “derampers looking to get in cheaper”.
2. How delusional are you to think anyone should take any note of anything you say, especially given you can’t spell “holder”.
3. Filtered.

FFS Ironhide. Make up your mind and pick a position.

As I said, hypocrisy. Ironhide’s narrative that the price action looks like a placing being worked is just as good if not better reasoning given there is actually evidence upon which to actually base his hypothesis (although still ultimately pure conjecture).

So either reasoning is acceptable or it’s not. You can’t have it both ways.

Serious question. What did all you incessant posters do with your lives before the advent of the internet?

Ironhide - Why do you write posts about “placement” and “placees” like they are statements of fact when in reality they are pure conjecture on your part?

“ COPL America’s lender is a Credit Fund”

Where do you get this information from? According to the 18 February 2021 RNA the lender is “a US based Global Investment Firm (the "Lender")”.

Totally agree. Angusscott has been (in my opinion) ramping this for months so to have such a strong sentiment change is bizarre.

What news is better?

I’m fu&@ing sick of this company and the failure of the people running it to just deliver on what they say.

“This pulls us back to the real basics… WE ARE A PRODUCING COMPANY…”

And? We knew that over a year ago. The real basics are that we are still nowhere near the daily output that for the last 12 months the company have been saying is the target.

“You my son belong with the "green bar" brigade LOL.”

Ditto. Right back at you.

“Don't knock it BB, I made £50K in 88E in THREE WEEKS!

Devilbhoy, are you listening?”

No, because you are an anonymous poster on a bulletin board who spouts a load of pish and can claim anything you want with no requirement to evidence said claims. You must be more gullible and/or delusional than I thought if you think I would believe something just because you claim it.

Yes. 7Digital.

Nice to see you acknowledge you spout rubbish jiddy123. Acceptance is the first step to recovery.

Tomorrow. Regardless of the news, the risk of the share price dropping vs reward of the share price increasing is weighted towards the former. It would need to be one hell of an update for the share price to move significantly and therefore even if it is a positive update I doubt you’ll pay much of a premium for waiting until tomorrow.

By sheer law of averages Charlie1984, you will be right one day. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally.

“On 1st Feb the company said there would be an information blackout until 30th March”

As explained multiple times by multiple people, no they didn’t. Why are you struggling to understand this?

“The inability of people to read is depressing. I suggest people re-read the last 3 substantive RNS's and then wait for 30/3. It said there would be a "news blackout" until 30/3.”

The inability of you to read, understand basic terminology and accurately quote is depressing.

What the 1 February RNS actually says is “Insiders have limited opportunities to purchase their company shares in the market due to the timing of regulatory blackout periods and unannounced market sensitive information”. A regulatory blackout period is the period in which employees and related parties are not allowed to trade in the company other than for very specific reasons, so it has jack $h!t to do with a “news blackout”. It just means they are in a closed period due to being in possession if material facts.