Member Info for Devilbhoy

“OIL is only going up in the short term”.

In your opinion. There are countless opinions of people far better qualified and positioned than you who disagree. Hence why hedges exist and are required by lenders.

“If the lift doors are being held at this level for an II to load up the decent thing would be to get above the threshold and bloody release a TR1….”

But they almost certainly aren’t and therefore there won’t be a TR1. Usual bull**** excuse used by someone in denial.

“If you believe they can get the stuff out of the ground then relax. Remember, confirmed minimum 1 billion barrels of oil in the ground.”

Prime example of why there is virtually no point in releasing the RS report.

Guerillainvestor - I never commented on the reasons we are where we are. I was stating that your post was utter nonsense.

“This rush to convert the bonds to shares even though we had 90 daysmeans only one thing.
Art has no confidence of getting the production numbers up this quarter or signing offf the RBL.
short term traders should get out of this share whilst they can.”

This statement perfectly sums up that you have no understanding of what you are posting about.

lapalabra - Not sure what your motivation is (perhaps just bored or delusional?) but regardless, you are a complete *******.

“Held back as the mongs on here won't understand it.”

Oiler87 top of that list. They couldn’t even understand that the company had not promised to communicate the RS report by a specific date. If you can’t understand something as simple as that, you have no chance understanding a technical petroleum engineering survey report.

What difference would it make? The overwhelming majority who post on LSE either can’t read and/or interpret simple information in RNSs. What makes you think they will understand a Ryder Scott report?

“If you’re a genuine investor you will watch this presentation. It’s very good so far.”

It really wasn’t. Too much time spent on what the problems have been and virtually no time or details on how they get this thing to the point it creates shareholder value or on explaining the finance deal so all the idiots who don’t understand it yet seem to think they are experts on it can be discredited.

Trek - Explain explicitly what you mean by “forward” sold please.

“Interested to see how the investor presentation goes later...”

Why? They just constantly talk pish. Did he not say just last a few weeks ago that the investor who provided the new loan was a long term investor?

So many people who clearly don’t understand what they are talking about posting utter pish.

barnyards - You are just another in an incredibly long list of utter f&&kwits that have a void in their life. I pity you.

“At the time the Atomic transaction completed, the assets produced 1,100 barrels of light oil. After the implementation of a works programme by COPL, the asset has since then far exceeded original expectations and current production (gross) of approximately 1,600 barrels a day is restricted due to ongoing facility constraints.”

Is this a quote from a COPL RNS or someone within the company? Regardless, wherever it is from, it’s taking the ****.

What a bunch of delusional narcissists. That any of you think anything you say has any impact on the share price is mind blowing.

“Save your screen shots people. FCA need them.”

I’m honestly interested in why you typed this, as only an idiot thinks that either the FCA are interested (that’s assuming anyone even makes a report which I very much doubt) or that screenshots would be sufficient evidence of anything.

Why can’t you accept that there are not enough buys?

I studied Latin at school, so yes. So essentially you are saying “I have made a statement that has absolutely no relevance to COPL”.

No, what you meant to post was “I can’t answer”, hence why you try to obfuscate that fact by trying to claim I am a “loon”. It’s a common and transparent tactic of individuals who are unable to provide a rational and objective argument to support their position.

Incidentally, I’ll virtually guarantee that I have more invested in this company that the majority of the Walter Mitty’s that post on this board and therefore have a significantly greater interest in the share price appreciating but I’m just not a complete f&@kwit child who ignores reality and is content with posting nonsense like “choo choo”, etc.

It’s bewildering that so many posters on this board are able to hold down a job never mind have enough cash to be gambling on COPL given the level of stupidity of some of the posts.

“You know nothing about Oilers Devilbhoy. Care to explain the mcap to me for 88E?”

No, because it’s disconnected from reality. That you use an anomaly that anyone with half an ounce of sense knows is not worth it’s current market value as your benchmark for valuing COPL demonstrates what an idiot you are.

“You heard of dana petroleum
Went from a penny share to a 2 billion pound company.”

Irrelevant, unless you can categorically prove that the situation COPL is in and the actions of the CEO exactly mirror that company. Picking random exceptions to support an unfounded statement is as idiotic as using 88E as your argument.

“First bought ASC for 8p. Sold after a five bag. It went to a peak of £51 per share (you read that right) over the next 10 years.”

Using a clothing retailer that was one of the first to recognise the potential of the internet to transform retail as your comparison. Do I need to explain why this is stupid?