Member Info for DerSack

Cheap revenge, isn't it, Swazers?

To put it all together, just have a look here:

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=PHE&share=Powerhouse-Ener&thread=F8853381-49A0-4E4B-B357-C6CE3A4AE533

or here ...

https://ibb.co/yFvhCRc

If you're out for escalation, do whatever you like, but this image will follow you ...
https://ibb.co/yFvhCRc
Never forget: The internet never forgets.

Hey Swazers, nice of you to express yourself. How about facts instead of assumptions and accusations? That would be good style. Let's get a few things straight:
- The "Detective" account is not mine
- Contrary to your statement, I have 654 total posts, not 353
- It's not 99.9% of it EQT. About half is AFC, a large part is EQT, some are PHE (which I discovered before you without your recommendation and didn't repel even in the 0.9p valley), a little ITM and some PPS. Please note: The current pie chart in the LSE user profile only refers to the postings of the last few days, which should be clear to you as a chartist, and it is also written there. Scroll down a few pages and you'll find the rest.
The only thing that is correct from your statements is that I have something to do with the EQT Telegram Channel. I was even the one who kicked you out and banned you when, after a post in by one of your disciples was criticized there, you came like a Master in a 70ies kung fu film to the “enemy kung fu school” to restore your “school’s” honor.
If you deal with facts and figures like this, I'm not surprised that you react so nervously when someone criticizes your statements.
If you ever find a verifiable statement, that is certainly a win for you and those around you. Until then, keep posting guesses, accusations, and wild charts until you turn green. Meanwhile, I agree with Mark Twain and will not Argue any further with you.
Kind regards

Sorry for bringing this back to top, but someone seems to be the master of information removal, and now my
previous posting looks like an answer to nothing. It was an answer to a posting which disappeared without comment a few hour after my answer to it. This the one that is missing:

swazers / Tue 22:41 / Posts: 811 / Price: 3.89:
"I can't read what the trolls are saying cos I have them all on filters. This fresh lot of trolls have come over from the EQT board. They are very angry at some of the charts I dropped earlier today. Like attacking me is going to make any difference in the price of the stock. Please report any off-topic & abusive messages. I am here for PHE. Nothing else."

Fortunately the internet never forgets.

Since many people subscribe to twitter, but hardly anybody reads the tweets, this one has been missed by this LSE board so far. Eqtec were "Delighted to show Damien Moore MP our project site in Southport UK recently. We explained how it will reduce waste & generate clean energy locally." (https://twitter.com/eqtec/status/1485622889013465089)

And from there, the name and idea of Eqtec found its way into the House of commons five days ago ...

Damien Moore, Conservative MP for Southport:

"I am sure that my right hon. Friend would agree with me that we need a range of options to ensure that energy prices in the UK remain affordable. To that end, I recently met Eqtec, a company operating in my constituency in partnership with Southport Hybrid Energy Park, that will turn waste into power without the emission of toxic fumes and that aims to provide enough clean energy for 20% of the homes in Southport. Does he agree that a debate to discuss clean energy innovation companies such as Eqtec would be worthy of this House and worthy of the time of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy?""
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2022-01-20b.508.0#g511.1

Jacob Rees-Mogg,
Conservative MP for North East Somerset
Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons:

"I am grateful to my hon. Friend for bringing this to the attention of the House. Companies such as Eqtec are exactly what we need to keep us on course for net zero by 2050 while maintaining a healthy, varied and affordable energy supply. Embracing a wide variety of energy sources is vital for keeping the lights on and our houses warm. As the recent difficulties have shown, we need to embrace a widespread energy supply, from nuclear power to power provided by companies such as the one that my hon. Friend mentions, and, of course, natural gas as a transition fuel on the journey to net zero in 2050.

Her Majesty’s Government are committed to decarbonising our electricity system by 2035, backed by investment in renewables, such as tidal stream energy and nuclear. I am sure that, above all, our voters care for cheap, plentiful energy in their homes, and we want to ensure that that is compatible with net zero. As for the debate, it is either one for Westminster Hall, or, perhaps, under your generous auspices, Mr Speaker, for an Adjournment debate."
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2022-01-20b.508.0#g511.2

Come on CharlieBrown10, be honest: last time you were here you were bullish.

Besides this I've heard everything from you from under 1p to just under 30p during the past twelve months. Of course, if you cover the full spectrum, you are always right one day or another. Even a totally defective cuckoo clock shows the correct time twice a day.

But you also said at some point that you want buy in or more when it goes below 1p. How much did you buy today?

There are only two known shareholders > 3% (last updated 2022-06-01):
Altair Group Investment Limited (19.0%)
TB Amati Investment Funds Limited (5.43%)

Wouldn't expect a TR1 from one of them.

Yeah showmethemoneyy, you'r right. If you're in a hurry, better go back to VLS, where it ususally takes only two weeks to lose 50% of you money after the pump and dump spikes.

Nice find tigermunchkin. Part by part, the puzzle becomes a whole. In addition to Wood and Eqtec, the agreement of the first Eqtec / Wood RNS of October 5, 2020 had a third agreement partner who has not yet reappeared in our sense: DS MENA (MENA = Middle East North Africa). Their part of the agreement was described as follows:

"The team at DS MENA brings deep knowledge of the full spectrum of elements that impact the commercial, funding and execution ability of energy project developments that embrace the transition to a cleaner, lower carbon and more sustainable energy economy. DS MENA is also expected to provide an efficient channel for Middle East project opportunities and local partnerships through one of its local associated companies, DS MENA LLC. "
(RNS "Technology & market review / Potential collaboration", October 5th, 2020)

Deltasource list us on their website as a "partner". Maybe we'll hear a little more about it next year .:

https://www.deltasource.co.uk/

Hope you bought ETQ :-)

Come on, CharlieBrown10, in the EoY Predictions list of the LSE EQT board you're pretty high up with 25p. In this point I wish you of course that you are really right. But I no longer believe in this either and would be happy with 10% of your EoY prediction for the next couple of weeks.

Anyway ... you've sounded very pessimistic during the last few days. Get a little more bullish again. It's Christmas soon :-)

We rose in the spring because of the hopes for this same peer group and fell again in the rest of the year because of the connection to this same group.

It's not that easy to separate. We are in the green category. We are currently making energy and other things out of waste. At least that is the general external perception.

The main difference is that our development goes beyond the peer group cycles. We will no longer be dependent on expectations and promises about future technology because we already offer working solutions in the here and now. We won't be generating profits or saving the world in a few years' time, but now ... And we are on the way to converting these solutions into licensing models in order to generate sales without investing a lot of capital.

As soon as the last one has understood that we are no longer a green-tech power plant builder, but a project planner with ambitions to become a licensor, there will be no stopping us.

But until then, one has to put up with the comparisons with the peer group ... and contrary to what the gimps say, we are doing very well.

The eternal wailing of the always the same begins to bore me. Today I spent a few minutes to see if others would do better. As of December 17. (Unfortunately, the LSE site does not provide exact values for today), it looks like this in our peer group:

EQT
2020: 1.15p
2021: 1.20 p

ITM
2020: 392p
2021: 378p

CWR
2020: 1142p
2021: 965p

AFC
2020: 50.8
2021: 48.45

PHE:
2020: 4.9
2021: 4.3

PPS (Proton)
2020: 62.5
2021: 39

Ballard:
2020: ca. 17ct
2021: 11ct

....

See something? We are the only ones in our peer group who are not deep red after a year, not even red at all: we are in profit.

And why?

Guess!

Exactly: In addition to all the green hype, we are profitable because EQT is on the way to making a profit. It looks like our management did well.

Carbonfuture provide an easy to read article about the triple bottom line thig at North Fork here:

https://www.carbonfuture.earth/magazine/unique-triple-bottom-line-project-in-north-fork-ca-reduces-wildfire-risk-produces-renewable-energy-helps-the-climate-and-local-community

And they have a corresponding LinkedIn Article here:

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6876869301614321664/

This article was reposted and commented by DP: "Credible and tangible initiatives, partnerships with experienced developers with mature project pipelines and supported by proven breakthrough technologies than can rapidly scale, is the real differentiator in having the impact required to achieve global decarbonisation targets. Excited about what 2022 is bringing..."

Until here, everything is just great info, but the next point makes it very promising: He commented his own repost with a link to the following email article:

https://mailchi.mp/carbon180/the-deep-end-a-year-in-carbon-removal?e=2bbe97deed

Trytrytryagain, maybe because it's the other way round:
Tell them that taking away 1t of pure Carbon avoids the production of 3.66t of CO2 from that 1t C and 2.66t O2 :-)

Aandy,
this could be due to the fact that we generate CO2 when we convert some of the CO / syngas into energy. The 2MW have to come from somewhere :-)

The nice thing is that in relation to mass, CO2 only consists of 12/44 of C and 32/44 of O2.

So one ton of biochar corresponds to aporximately 3.5 tons of CO2.

Carbon removal credits.

Today's RNS was gold since it pretty well descrbies the way of DP and his crew:

"the Company continues to expect revenues in 2021 from technology sales to several entities and projects, including
[...]
the EQTEC Italia Market Development Centre [...] ("Italia MDC"),
the Belišce, Croatia MDC ("Croatia MDC"),
the Karlovac, Croatia project ("Karlovac") and
the Livadia, Greece project ("Livadia 1"),

as well as from development services fees to the
Croatia MDC,
Karlovac, and
Livadia 1."

All these projects were first announced May 2021 or later. And all of them have already returned money or are expected to do so before the end of the year, while many older projects are still a little bumpy.

Only a few weeks or months from mentioning the sites to the point of first finacial returns. Not years as it seems. What we see here is Eqtecs new way! And we already know that there is more to come soon, e.g. "Livadia 2"/Greece or "Drama"/Greece.

Today's rns was a brave step and long overdue. The 15 million hung like the sword of Damocles over Eqtec.

When the price dropped early this morning, there were no large numbers of shares sold, and many people were already using the dip before nine to top up or buy in. Nobody got out massively. We sank on a very small volume. To me it looks like some PIs have taken a little money off the table to be on the safe side for Christmas and the usual big bills at the turn of the year.

The monster that the usual suspects painted on every wall was actually only a toothless tiger.

Quite positive :-)

https://www.asktraders.com/analysis/the-eqtec-share-price-has-fallen-51-since-january-should-you-buy-it/