Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Who was saying it was any different to flat? Did their post get pulled?
Looks like it�s gone wrong again
Windy I do 1. It was a bad deal for Range 2. Range should take action against LO 3. I agree with poster that why does it take them 4 months to sort out a water pump if they know what they are doing?
I can�t take the credit for the post. This is from Nedkellylandau who posted on Worldstocks. They make some points about Landocean that need answering
Nedkellylandau posted this early today on Worldstocks. Would be interesting to see others thoughts on this �As time goes by we seem to be becoming more aware of the apparent failings of Landocean. Why did we get what appeared to be such a good deal with favourable payment rates and why did Landocean bail out of T&T? When Landocean came on board they were heralded as world leaders in secondary recovery including waterflood. They spent months and millions of our dollars on geological and technical surveys, allegedly to get the best results, promising several thousand bopd by end of 2017. Look where we are now. Few of us, if any, have expertise in waterflood but even I could have established that we had enough "water" for a waterflood and this obviously doesn't seem to have been the case. Take one step back. If you are a world leader in waterflood you should be aware of what pumps are required and what is available - not the case, another step back. Morne Diablo waterflood is so problematic that further work has been halted aqnd poor production rates. How come? What about the millions of dollars spent on surveys - at least two steps back! Lanocean has charged us millions but given very preferential payment schemes. Is this hindering legal action against them? In my view we should be chasing Landocean for reimbursement and compensation on the cock up that is apparently Waterflood It may not be the Chinese way of working but should we be taking action against LO. Some views for/against would be appreciated�
As you can see it�s very difficult to call at the moment https://www.dailyfx.com/forex/fundamental/article/special_report/2018/06/01/Crude-Oil-Weekly-Trade-Forecast-June-OPEC-Shale-Platts.html?ref-author=DFXGeneric
Another good piece https://www.energyandcapital.com/report/oil-outlook-2018-long-lost-recovery-or-price-crash/2494
Good article on the challenges around the world https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-06-01/this-is-what-an-oil-shock-looks-like
Opinion is split currently. This view would be bad for all oilers https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/29/cramers-charts-show-there-could-be-more-pain-ahead-for-oil.html Makes it a lot harder for any company wanting to pay debts back Perhaps Range will reduce production till Oil price rises as one poster recently mentioned
If it doesn�t effect us why post about it?
In England you call it Holland. We call it The Netherlands so sorry if I changed my posts for English posters as some may not know where The Netherlands is
Bountyman - I am here for 1 thing only and that’s to make money as a shareholder If you posted like Celticheart I would bring you to task Perhaps if said poster took your advice I and others wouldn’t need to point out his blantant misleading posts Ps In Holland we are taught to apologise when we are wrong which I did but others don’t due to their arrogance that they are always right or it’s someone else’s fault
Are you going to respond to Bountyman 9:00 post?
Bountyman - I accept one RNS was flat. I don't accept the other being 10% (difference of opinion) as the Q&A effected this and goes against the theory by some that traders sell on news I apologise for the mistake for the inaccurate post on the flat share price on Indonesia RNS I hope others apologise when they get it wrong in the future - last friday for instance
Its clear from the answers that you have no idea. 1. To say ex bitter holders who have lost thousands are going to do trades to lower price and waste more money is laughable 2. The traders aren't looking to drop the price - how low do you think Range can go as they are nearly at all time low with POO at double recent prices and some believing it will hit $100 a barrel 3. Again traders will be working on better margins than Range can offer. The wide spread is not worth traders effort As regards the chart I will post when I see fit and not from any pressure from any other poster and it will be in Dutch which is against the rules of LSE so may get pulled
I will post my chart if you answer Bountyman’s 3 questions 1st
That was on the back of the Q&A which was released on same trading day. I was talking purely Indonesia on its own RNS I have done my own charts of events ignoring the price monitored extensions as they are identical at 6.98%
Interesting that every time a RNS is released about Indonesia the share price drops http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/exchange-insight/news-analysis.html?fourWayKey=AU000000RRS3GBGBXASQ1 That�s if you can trust the London Stock Exchange with correct information
I like facts - sometimes they are hard to take like the share price Friday