RE: Sheer Manipulation30 Jul 2020 04:45
Certainly agree with you on the green element Ps. As far as financing, the reality is, service companies are now more then even being forced to evolve. The pipeline of greenfield projects being brought forward by majors is dwindling, even nonexistent. When you consider the scale of BR, this proposal will look very attractive to service companies willing to accept some risk in return for a share Equity and ultimately free cash flows. We know BR could produce 100k bopd in time. Financing won’t be an issue imo, particularly when using a phased Dev framework with fixed costs. I’m familiar with the risk profile of some of these companies and their appetite to move into this space. I have no doubt the companies involved will silence some on this board.
1cagnay. The majority of the North Sea is a sweet waxy crude, at atmospheric temperature, unrefined its actually solid. Like holding a brown, light, flexible piece of clay. Happy to show you some pictures if needed. (Worth Googling) Platform Shutdown periods cater for the maintenance process in involved, pigging pipe etc. Heated pipes is now very common in the North Sea, a specialty of Subsea 7. Worth remembering, This is what the the consortium members do day in day out. Very technical.
- google subsea well heads and Christmas trees, manifolds, umbilicals. That will give you a flavour.
No conspiracies, It’s pretty straight forward PVR can’t use a listed companies name/brand to promote its position/ SP without permission. Does that really surprise you? These are massive multi national corporate companies, google a few from my lis as an example. SpotOn is a private company so can be discreet, PVR can’t.