RE: Why "K"?2 Aug 2020 11:16
I’m not overthinking this, Imo there is no particular affinity to any one location. They have a very good understanding of the asset. Site K, most likely an area where they have done the most extensive analysis, OWC depths, GWC depths, correlation of data, sands and pressures from neighbouring wells. The asset hasn’t changed. This was probably the original marked location for a phase 1 development before TOR got lead astray by the allure of a Chinese 6 well, big money campaign. The consortium partners, Schlumberger in particular will probably have hands eyes on this, and like it. But no doubt they can and probably will drill any of those other sites.