Member Info for deepjoy

Serious lack of volume today.

simple..sit tight and wait for news but be prepared to wait a long time potentially .. :)

It's not often you get a broker target price 200% higher than the current SP ...laughable really :)

or that know nothing and are panicking.. We'd have seen TR1's by now so he herd is reacting. Either way it is grim I'll give you that but this share has been here before and bounced back

Yep..hindsight is something we can all relate to at one time or another.

You sold out then rH? change of heart?

Grim....

so much for the seller cleared remark.. LOL

the website is dire also with no commercial aspect to it just the same research enqs...

You're right I did and bought back on the ridiculous drop after December and now sit on at an average of 48p. I am not going to chase this down but unless the company start talking to the market it is going to re-test lows again..sadly

Yep... top up for me below 40 and that is where it is heading without news ...

you forgot to qualify that with the quantities ...it isn't much of the total production is it?

You see you can't find any reference to me ever stating that a bid had been made, only discussions which is exactly what Eric the CEO said took place. Likewise you have no come back on anything other than grasping for edited context comments from here or from articles. erm... only one clown here I think.

copy and paste those comments then???

last week Mr Bushy or not so bushy stated 'Will look for sub 10p for buying back' and then the became a little agitated with fellow posters when he trade play didn't quite pan out. Now he is back, not in any vain attempt to de-ramp the price but to convince himself that he is right and the market is wrong... i.e arrogant .. filtered

You are an arrogant idiot ... you omitted the precluding and most important point of the article which precludes any hostile bid :
'The usual first step is to make an offer to the board of directors of the company to purchase a controlling stake in the company. The board of directors may reject that offer on the grounds that it is not in the best interest of the company's shareholders.' END

That is why a low ball bid was not made because the BOD had already set out their position which is what Eric stated was the case.

Now run along back to HOC board and carry on telling them all their mistakes.. LOL

Thank you ontarget.. Saved me writing reams of rebuttal. But for the record :

I stated -"Eric has already stated in interview that the price they discussed was below the level the board would accept"

so if you construe that to mean that anything other than that the board of directors were involved then I pity you.

Bushy now I think you really are a bit thick...I wrote the board not Eric! And he was quite clear that the board would not entertain a low offer and that is exactly why no formal bid was announced. The reason because the Board of Directors sent them packing!! It isn't hard if your take your agenda glasses off pal.

They'd didn't, Eric has already stated in interview that the price they discussed was below the level the board would accept. Do your homework!!

..in this share. They know exactly how retail investors think and start a low bid let it run up then cut it sharply to scare people out. Meanwhile the churn happens and overall we don't move down much at all and they get shares. Hats off to them for it, it is clever to see them skimming. Dont like it but hey if you know what they do it is easier to let it ride...