Member Info for Daz9643

Well there must be a bigger team selling twice a month judging by the share price performance!

I think the commercial update on the 15th November was AFC saying that's all folks, at least for 2018. I wouldn't get your hopes up of seeing any other news now.

Hence the low share price !

*seems

i'll give you some free advice, never make the first buy of the day !
Always seems unusually high, around 6.2 - 6.5 range, so buy end of the day, sell at the start emms to be the key at the moment

SEEKS TRADING HALT PENDING ANNOUNCEMENT ON MATERIAL ACQUISITION BY COMPANY.

Nothing to do with Empyrean

Go on now go
sell your shares
AFC aren't interested and really have no cares
if you're feeling a bit miffed
and you can't see far ahead
then you'd better get out now and take yourself to bed
now go cry....

Didn't realise AFC were taking part !

It's on page 11 BumbleB

I had a discussion on here with someone some time ago and disputed whether we had even achieved 2 years yet, they said yes, I said no. I've just looked back at the 2018 AGM and it mentions >2 years on small scale systems, and well in excess of 1 year on large scale systems, therefore I'm surprised there was no further mention of this in the recent update as it is fairly key to the whole system.

Because it wouldn’t make any difference, you still won’t get answers to- How long before we have a commercial product for sale ? When do we expect to break even ? What is the profit forecast for the next 3 years ? Rather than what happened at the agm where the questions were all about the technology stage we were at.

I think they misworded that RNS, it meant to say 1mW

They are a public company and need to be held to account for their continual failure to deliver, as part owners of this company we have a right to know. It’s been said up to now they have done everything they said they would however once again they are back to failure mode

Interested to know how you continue to justify their failure to deliver anything

Having read it again, this is interesting -
'In direct response to growing customer demand for a more compact fuel cell system where footprint and weight are issues in the selection of power generation technologies,'
Bearing in mind they only have one customer this makes me think they're not getting sales because the system is too bulky. Not sure why weight would be an issue for a power generator though ? Cost of shipping it half way around the world maybe ?

It could be for powering a remote human settlement on Mars in 2050 !

isn't this relating to replacing diesel generators ? not new.

while that's great news, all that says to me is 'we haven't finished the existing alkaline system yet and have been sidetracked producing something else which also isn't ready'

if the RNS had said - AFC Energy has now successfully concluded the engineering design i'd be excited

rather than - AFC Energy has now successfully concluded the MAJORITY of engineering design (weren't we nearly ready last autumn ?)

Ooh i have Bumble and still i can't see it, give me a clue, the suspense is killing me !