RE: blimey20 Sep 2021 22:32
Well didnt take long to revert to type with the name calling did it. You really should learn to take others views onboard occasionaly, even if they dont agree with your own viewpoint, just might surprise you. Now man, im not cuddling up to anyone, not my style, and you shouldnt suggest that i have made any suggestion you are involved in The Cranfield crash or anything similar. I havent and i couldnt care less if you was.
You have posted on here you are involved in an 18 seater hydrogen (it was nitrogen a couple of times) powered plane that will fly in 2022 and be commercially availible in 2025.
Now, try as hard as i can I can find nothing whatsoever like it anywhere, other than the Cranfield failure and the tiny drone thing based in SA, there are a sprinkling of other prototypes about but not as you describe. There is nothing bigger than the Cranfield failure (previously) flying.
I'll remind you i investegate companies with a Regulatory hat on to gather evidence for prosecution for a living, and im pretty good at it, but alas i can find nothing nada zilch.
So instead of all the grandstanding and trumpet blowing id go so far as to say your are simply full of bs and unable to back up your statements with any evidence/links? possibly why your on here pontificating to anybody who is daft enough to listen without question. As for life, i have a great one thank you, full of family and great friends