Member Info for Daytradenovice

It definately isnt DC, especially when its obvious they had to use the revolver to pay for the shares as they are down to only £5.9m of their own cash in the bank.

Anything bought with credit terms is instantly encumbered. Poor tradey just isnt able to get his head around simple things like this and just has a meltdown when found to be wrong.

So cannot answer then tradey when challenged, running to the hills again says it all.

So lets just play silly math, even though you clearly dont understand this.

BOo state unencumbered assets of £136.1m in RNS

You state REVB investment of 27% counts (it doesnt and you give no evidence,as requested)

So putting aside your misassumption of how this all works, and just playing with the numbers alone.

So if Revb Mcap = £78m.

27% of £78m = £21m

So £136m + £21m = £157m

Which is way off your stated amount, that ive asked for substantiation of that you cannot provide, of £170m.

So clearly, even allowing 27% of revb to be included (incorrectly) all this shows is Your a liar, and simply trying to mislead people, with you nonsense made up £170m of unencumbered assets.

Feels like the 'return of capital' stupidity all over again.

So yet another lie then tradey.

You said "near 30%"

RNS states 27%. So you have also embellished that figure as well.

Also, i note it doesnt state anything of the sort that they have 'added £35m to their unencoumbered assets' as a result of their purchase.

When in a hole best stop digging, wouldnt you say.

Only one compulsive liar on here im afraid.

You see him when you brush your teeth in the morning

So then why havent you posted up the RNS's you refer to for us to see?

The specific ones you now mention where the company clearly state that they "have added a total of circa £35m worth of unemcumbered assets" to their bottom line with their purchase of shares.

You havent, because they havent, have they.

Snake oil salesman misleading people again.

There is no "suppose" about it. he is possibly (whether you agree with his BOO position or not) the most polite of posters on here.

As for critisising people who held down from £3. So what?, was he wrong?, havent others including myself not done exactly the same? The only difference is that he is seemingly prepared to change his mind as things alter, something many many others on here are incapable of doing, and that, in my view also, makes them poor investors.

Whether you agree/disagree with his views (or anybody elses) or not doesnt give anybody the right to gang up and try to demonise the guy. Thats what silly children do in a school playground.

As for SCB's ancient history tours through peoples past historys, he should maybe stick to his own history. That 'clown' has been banging on about ridiculus £6.50 sharre prices for yonks on here.

Maybe some of the fanboys should pick him up for once, rather than just gang up on others and ignore his nonsense.

Dont like being caught out do you, come back with a load of made up waffle and get all agressive and abusive to boot, same old same old.

well tough. just like on your 'return of capital' rubbish you've got this spectacularly wrong as well.

Snake oil salesman

Dont think liars should get away with misleading others Slacker. If you do, thats disappointing but thats your perogative.

Unbelievably, three fellow fanboys have recommended him for his woefully inaccurate lying figures. The RNS state £136.1m boys - go and READ it to see the truth from the company itself and take the blinkers off, eh!

"trading4good

Posts: 13,174

Price: 32.03

No Opinion

RE: WellToday 10:54

And Pedro how likely is it that a business generating FCf, with £170m unencumbered assets is likely to go bust.

Come on let's see if you can get beyond vacuous word bingo.

ReplyRecommend (3)"

Hard to believe he'd make stuff up i know, but there you go, yet another easily disproven load of misleading lying nonsense from him.

So easily checked as well. Its all in the latest RNS.

Snake oil saleman

Always found PP1 quite respectful and polite towards all posters on here.

A lesson some of the people that slate him could do with learning for themselves.

From the last RNS issued.

So your lying again tradey.

Please explain where you have established that unencumbered assets are now £170m - when the company says they are £136m?

"Strong cash generation with free cash flow of £30.2 million as a result of significant inventory and working capital improvements (2022: -£251.2 million), and balance sheet strength maintained with £136.1 million of unencumbered freehold assets, £5.9 million net cash and a £325 million Revolving Credit Facility, giving £331 million of liquidity headroom"

"And Pedro how likely is it that a business generating FCf, with £170m unencumbered assets is likely to go bust. "

I could be wrong, but, didnt the last set of figures give unencumbered asset at £136m? If i recall you got picked up for repetedly stating they were £150m.

Now, according to you, it seems they are now £170m.

I do wish you'd stop lying to massage these up to sound better.

Not for me Troajan, keep away from the littlies myself just buy the bigger players.

Faired better than i thought it would today, only "manipulated" down a little bit.

Or was the drop due to "uninvested" Trolls, Shorters, dodgy MM's or just plain old sentiment and market forces.

Answera in a postcard to secret squirrel.

Running to the hills again when challenged tradey.

Hardly surprised happens every time.

Did you ever manage to think of a prediction you got right? you've had quite a number of extra bonus 'sleeps' but i dont seem to recall a response?

Odd that

Am personally quite happy to admit id like at least three odious individuals on this board to lose money.

The great news as far as im concerned is that they all mosr definately are .

Rampers on a spike. You know who you are 〽️〽️〽️

Am inteligent enough not to pay £3.78 for this pile of rubbish though eh Dung.

Unlike you who was ramping the rear end of it at the time.

Thats all that matters when picking stocks - dont choose a turkey.

You failed, shame.

Well Karcha i used to think better of you, but alas the veil has slipped and all you seem to add now are silly insults from absolutely nowhere.

No i dont go to school, and no "mommy doesnt take me" and who the hell gives a t0ss about spelling?, this platform is about making money with shares, 100% spelling and grammer is not anything important nor related at all to that endevour. If you think it is it might just explain where you are going wrong.

Ask your mommy for some advice on manners would be my suggestion.

Nah, not at all.

Just dont like supposed 'experts' popping off at people for no reason having just made a prediction and got it wrong by 25% in such a short space of time - then thinking they know it all when they clearly dont.

Few too many of that type on here all holding losses.