We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Thanks Phil, I stupidly took it hard due to the frustrstiin here, should have known better. The world would be a pretty boring place if we all did indeed agree on everything, that's why I try to look at everything from both angles.
Let's hope for some good news soon, as this sgare is beyond painful now.
Phil my apologies if my last post reads abrupt, I took you're last post of accusing me of me being bitter.
Also regarding your comment about Duncan steering the ship for the last 8 years, i'd say he's been a failure. The pipeline has progressed at the expense of private investors (SP/ mcap fall from highs of £10), that makes no sense commercially. A business value is supposed to grow in value as it progresses, not the other way round. Also they haven't managed to hit any licensing deals or give an indication of when they expect to, so effectively operating as a research entity.
Phil not sure how I sound bitter, i'm just frustrated with the way this lot have handled things. Been one thing after another, silence, delays, ignoring investors, lack of ii investment, cash management, to name a few. I'm certainly not one of those to pretend everything is rosy, and a big deal is happening behind closed doors to reward shareholders. You on the other hand are only looking for positives to give yourself some consolation, nothing wrong with thst but don't come on here calling people bitter for static an opposing view or reality of the situation.
You can't credit Duncan for the science or the strategy, that rests largely with Alex and the scientists. I'm sure if you had invested at £10 a few years back, youbwouldn't be on here sayinh how great Duncan is.
Anyway it's not about the pipeline we need to worry about right now, it's the financing. If the pipeline progresses by causing a great dilution to current investors, then not exactly something you should be happy about is it.
Phil Duncan is responsible for bring in IIs in his capacity as CEO, he needs to be sacked. 8 years and hasn't gone any on board, even after a Nasdaq listing. Seems like they only went to Nasdsq to get their pay rises, as that seems to be the only benefit to come out of it.
Phil agree thinks need to turn around quivkly here, as it's getting tedious.
I see masterbater is back with his usual nonsense.
Phil, that's where good management plays a key role. Why chose to list on Nasdaq for example, without doing some DD on the investor appetite there. It wasn't a cheap exercise and cost £44m, so not exactly cash 4D could afford to lose. Going back to your point about the NASDAQ biotech besr market, again biotechs on AIM seem to be doing OK, so why did they list?
I don't think it's being as a negotiating tool, diluting your investors and using this as leverage isn't exactly a smart move. Your theory does not add up but even if i agree it still doesn't make sense, since pis lose either way.
For example 4D reject a "blackmail" attempt as you put it on the basis of a 100% placing being available, then current investors lose 50% of their holdings if exercised, yet if they accept a lower offer from a partner they keep 100% of their holding. I know which i'd go for as the difference is not going to hundreds of millions.
Voting for and risking a 100% dilution just to get a few million more in any potential partnership is insane.
They might have achieved great things in 8 years, but they've certainly not been able to reflect that in shareholder value. That has done the total opposite in the last 8 years apart from when Woodford jumped on board, Duncan had been a consistent failure in that dept.
The dilution needs to be voted down, yet you have a few that are trying to justify it. This is not what i or anyone elde invested in, it seems the BOD are taking the easy option and diluting holders to keep the lights on.
As SR says, where is all this US investment thst was hyped about last year. The BOD and the rampers kept saying AIM was undervaluing their company, however it seems like NASDAQ has done a better job of this. 1.50 to 30p is insane. If they didn't bother listing over there, they'd still have a bucket of cash sitting their right now. They need to be held to account for their actions here, or shown the door. Enough is enough. Their performance has been shambolic, and don't give a toss about shareholders. We've been very patient here, but it certainly isn't paying off.
Wow what a bullish presentation. Time to get these golden tickets cheap while you can, sale imminent with a target price of 80p+. Still cheap for the resource that Landore has, current mcap doesn't even cover Nickel, let alone gold.
As an example recent sale of a company Bill gace was a company with 600m oz that sold for £50m. We have 1500m oz proven with a potential of 5m oz, plus the Nickel and trading at just £20m, it's laughable. BOD have mafe it clear they expet to sell within a few months.
Well let's hope they get it sorted soon, and we can all move on. I can't take 5 more years of this radio silence.
Well this is a poor show from the company. How the hell are we below the opening price on the day of the oncology results? It's almost as if they never happened, so where is the reward for those us that decided to hold into results and thereafter.
As much i like the company, losing faith in the board and it's contempt of shareholders.
Well you sold and bought back in, so makes you as bad as Sang and co.
Posting on here at unusual hours , non stoo suggests you are having nightmares.
Well said FD, such people are normally sad lonely individuals, with no motivation in life other than gain pleasure from the misfortune of others.
Yes the director's have been dissapponting, but it isn't all over like they make it out to be.
And porky is another pig that changes his views depending on whether he is invested at the time ir not.
Masterbaiter you are the lowest of the low, all this effort to slaughter a company where you have no interest. You really are a pathetic human being, should be ashamed of yourself.
As for Sang he isn't mentally stable, perhaps 4D will develop a LBP to cater for his disease in due course. Another twat that will be ramping again, once he buys back in for his beer money.
Rog it's the agenda of yours and your Telegram group, deliberately misleasing investors, removing anyone that says anything realistic or expresses any dissappointment. Meanwhile you and your wife Lee Ramsey have been consistently wrong, and way out with your predictions :) but yet refuse to acknowledge it.
I am only in there for the entertainment lol :)
Sharcus, there hasn't been anything to say as we're still eaiting on the data thst was promised by Q4. I don't find it productive to post uneccessarily, like some on here that post the same thing day in day out, or on Rog's delusional Telegram group.
I wouldn't any attention to Rog, he's just another dreamer like a few of his associates on Telegram group lol....Management need to deliver here, they are failing investors bigtime, whilst loading up free options. Still not delievered on the Catalys they said they would, which is a disgrace.
Sorry to see the drop here, very dissappointing to say the least. Those in here should consider taking a look at DDDD, multiple catalysts in the coming weeks.
The cashburn in 2021 was higher than normal due to Nasdaq listing.
They need to get a flippin move on then