RE: Loading up in the teens.....19 Jun 2019 16:34
Thanks again.
Not sure on magnetite, from memory not heard anything for a long time on that one. Just looked back at rns dated 28/04/17, saying further testing and results shortly. Then Ni leach results but no more re magnetite.
Magnetite was (as referred to in this context (as also present in suplide ore I think)) in the oxide above the disseminated sulphide and 2019 presentation includes plan including oxide pit shell with separate key entry for Ni Cu pge resource area. Not v clear on my screen when trying to differentiate the two on plan/map.
Maybe they leaving that for now if depth of this deposit turns out to be sufficiently shallow, & would also keep the overall capex down if didn't go after magnetite. Maybe the magnetite is an ace in the hole type piece of newsflow and will be received/progressed closer to the project realisation than the current v early stage, if/when needed. Not sure/need updates generally on magnetite. Have read recently of deficits in the iron ore industry tho which bodes well price wise. Also have suspicions about possible vanadium content with possible credit value however only v speculative at present, no data at all that I can see - will look into penge fm at some point tho.
As I understand (been a while since I looked at this stuff) it was uml that held the prospecting rights. Uru own uml so control rights, umh in charge of mining right application including completion of prerequisite EIA. Risk for me was when license was due to expire & no news, then we had uodate of renewal. Whether prospecting rights get consolidated and or converted (in time) to mining rights whether in the name of uml or directly uru, shouldnt matter with current co structure. So long as the expenditure etc commitments are not defined and subsequently not met, licenses should continue to be controlled by uru
& not be returned to umh for uru shares.
Could be rusty so corrections/additions welcome as always.
I always try to think positively king, sometimes hard but always try. I just look back at the sp chart in connection with the Ni price at the time, then remember we only got 100% ownership 2014 and no prolonged Ni or even broad resource bull market has been experienced since. Yes other assets have been written off and dillution occurred but when considering the peaks and troughs of mcap & concurrent ownership of Zeb together with Ni market short to medium term prospects, the fact that those large holders who demonstrably wanted out & acted accordingly are now gone, SA slow but progressive jurisdictional improvement evidenced by Fraser institute rankings, large insiders holdings, higher grade (very significantly so in terms of equivalent grade), short term active exploration potential, & (to my knowledge) previously indisclosed assays of 2% Ni and 0.4% Cu, potential improved project economics through technological advances and beneficial forex movement, it all melts together to be potentially very positive indeed.
Aimo