RE: RNS15 Apr 2024 14:31
It makes perfect sense Bladey and I'm not surprised they decided to move on, there's a shortage of nitrogen and it gives them to review whilst the clock has essentially stopped. The trouble, as with all RNS's, there are keywords that small fry investors look for,. "water", "moved on" or "abandoned". I work for a large Blue Chip in Project Procurement and you are continuously balancing risk (I.e cost) against benefit. There is not a chnace that Sononagol would return to TO-14 unless there is was evidential benefit vs risk. The uneducated on here (ART) will have you believe it's game over.