Member Info for Culpepper

Or why they would wish to do so.

There you go. Them as it affects, will no doubt sort it.

Well, you lot appear to know more than me, and it’s a bit of a diversion.

I’m hard pressed to understand how somebody, without reasonable authority, can ‘sell down’, dispose of somebody else’s assets, rather than coming to an agreement to return them as they stand because holding them on your behalf has become inconvenient.

You see, I think it’s quite a simple model here. Even I can see it.

When revenue/profit, can reasonably be foreseen, cash therefrom paying exploration activities - on which majors may, if successful, wish to capitalise. Relatively small operation, globally but first ‘independent’ in the new frontier.

It’s ‘visionary’ from my own perspective, whilst at the same time making business sense to the company, as experienced ‘first movers’, looking for growth - exit on sale or carrying on as full cycle miners, initially in gold.

Yes. You can have a piece of this prior to index inclusion- , don’t know, as others have said, next quarterlies may be factored in to the price. Them out there arent daft.

You can never, well me anyway, be sure about these things. Share price is always difficult to assess, what we’re here, or anywhere, for.

Though some have their own ‘targets’ - goodness knows how they think they’re better than the analysts, so called.

But you have to have some sort of strategy on these miners. I’ve said mine - looking for perhaps a no real news period on one, all factored in, after FS, against a newsworthy and greater profitable period on this one at a point encompassing months at least.

This company is according to plan, operationally, and better, financially, after last raise,though I thought it would be trading higher.

Just me, I suspect there is still a seller in - if so, it will have an end to it.

Otherwise it would be to say the insiders, and those requesting shares at last and preceding raise, the second on request, have it wrong.

I go with them, their knowledge/ enquiries, and in my view common sense - so it’s at the very least 5p. short.

My take. A personal one.

I have 2 mining holdings.

On one, my broad intention is to hold until FS, end of year, to take whatever might come from that, index inclusion. And review.

At that time, Amrq will be coming into its own, production, revenue/profit, Suliaq JV. And maybe something from seasonal exploration.

All the best.

Yes, out of date seeing as how they actually raised £45m, and all of that ‘by request’ from institutions, apparently contacting the company, wishing to invest at this stage.

Maybe a little bit of a novel experience crept in.

All the best.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AMRQ/publication-of-a-prospectus-in-connection-with-recently-announced-fundraising-mmno1jti1gd7saa.html

I don’t know, but it crosses my mind the company is, after the opportunity afforded by institutions to raise, and just prior to share admission, ‘ putting right’in legal terms something that ‘should’ have occurred before.

It's my iPad. I promise you.

You're just another one of them, weakly appealing to others, and peddling your own small-mindednesd.

You diminish yourself. Sensible people reading this see through you, and those like you.

Number 1 spot must go to Bamps, for terest, though it doesn't help sp - what we want.

So, you know, what's the point?

We'll have to wait on ggp central

Easier to just do it Danny Boy.

The thin̈g is, with binning, it just pleases you.

What you don't Luke, actually, is the posts are still there, fir others.

So eat your heart out. Honestly.

I mean, just look at the facts, so far, people like you, have been proved wrong,

It's a bb, mis named, just a chat board, the way it goes.

Majority preaching expectations of course. Talking their own book.

I look to index inclusion at the mo. Little else.

I think I've been clear.

Perhaps you're the one who's confused.

As it is, this has been overhyped, leasing to disappointment.

The combined, not mine, boards fault, as usual.

Be as rude as you like, most are with me.

Most will know by now, I don't mind unsubstantiated gibberish from others.

Well, you know, on posting leading to listing, they didn’t have it right, on the day as,prophesied, like raising cash for Telfer.

In hindsight, they say how brilliant, whereas before Telfer was a dead duck. And how they said they were cheated on the raise.

Fickle bunch on here. Politicians got nothing on them on that score,mthough they think they’re qualified to debate.

I don’t agree with personal ‘snipers’. What do you see as the ‘good guys’ though. Them a# agree with the majority, in a smaller space and at a point in time?

Think about it, if you can.

Well, you might know better than me, easy for me to accept you do. My reading allows me to believe that in fact then*lobal financial world has tech ‘gateways’,permitting London to draw on Sydney, and all that.

Them who read more than me, may know otherwise, dark ages and all ta5. Ba4clays.

it’s all *******s, mostly, don’t you see that?

bit of a filler.

else nobody would bother. c’mon.

that’s why, as a serious interested party, monetarily, it suits plus you keep an eye.

helps yo7 grow, arguably -;though i’m pretty s3t in my ways.

No, I’m not all over it.

The rest of you lot have been, and still are.

I don’t seek to persuade. View it, opening your mind,just as balance on a bb.

Trippy won’t persuade any body to buy or sell either. This bb is a ‘goldfish’ bowl for them as partakes.

Otherwise, it would be ‘rocketing💥’ as prophesied.

Elementary, my dear Watson.

I’m hanging on for, hopefully, index inclusion. With a break maybe, after FS and prior to First ore, then first gold, later(2027?)

Plus, whatever the previouslynmso called on here ‘savvy’ Australian punters put on top, as they are supposed to do.

I still think mitt will be about index participation, rather than an awakening,mpendingbFS, and whatever next RNS on progress holds - different Domesnand all that malla4key.

Yes, it will pan out. Yet I thought, speaking against my theory earlier, AIM might, with its so called better liquidity, have at least matched ASX. Instead, it fell I think about 2% short.

I would add, as there’s been some discussion on here, about ASX price increase, that is from IPO flotation price, placing price and all that.

So it seems to me, just now, AIM reverting to ASX price.

All the best.

Argue away.