Member Info for Culpepper

I really should marshal my thoughts here. I have this, sometimes unfortunate habit of banging off things as they come into my head. Doesn’t do the board a service.

Firstly, thanks no cheesecake, for endeavouring to raise Amrq profile.

Seems to me Amrq is not yet valued as an odds on producer, yet alone, as an explorer, which could ‘hit’, all manner of resources, which might interest a major.

Nor is it valued, as a proxy to Greenland mining, as management believe, fingers in pies, Suliaq and all that.

And a few well-determined add ins to Nalunaq, Nanoq, as satellites, and all that. Plus the new mine, waiting for work, same premise as the flagship money provider.

First movers, looking to capitalise on experience.

It’s already something of a mover in Greenland - and most know the global interest in new resources.

On price - it done 120, and is further ahead now, operationally.

It was good enough for you confused academics, I thought, to conjure with.

As you did.

It’s well documented. Perhaps, like Stax, nine professes to be another disruptor, clouded in academia.

Strange old business, some of them on here. Innit?

There’s no infighting that holds water.

Some, like you, cant see it.

Though you love to make something of it, apparently, for your own reasons

You should all, by now have become accustomed to such postings.

Professor.

No.

Beyond that, I won’t play your game, writing you off as a disruptor.

I don’t see it going down, by the way, having regard to what ‘they’ paid for 10%. Price disclosure at thst point.

I hope that passive buying will help it up.

Though the clappers here, like ‘good’ opinions, it’s all ‘my arse’ aint it.

It’s a share, same as others, getting less exciting, as some pointed out, Elenentt, and to some advantage for those looking for hopefully, reliability on earnings.

Things go in and out of being stock market darlings.

Well, most on here bigger’in their own boots, honestly, innit?

You know that.

Frankly, who gives a damn for either of you, or anybody else on here. Don’t you lot get that, green binners and all.

Some maybe worth a read. In absence of RNS, share price movement. - who cares, apart from the chit chat to fill in.

Crikey.

My own thing is, they’ll only buy in if they they like it, and are doing so, in the belief and inevitability a seller will Stop.

Then it will proceed with alacrity.

Time moves on.

6 months.

“Do you like the stock Pepper?”

I’m in it til I’m out.

6 months, a year, broadly, and review..

You?

I agree, maybe the word is not yet, sufficiently, out on Amaroq.

Or insufficiently, appreciated, as a Greenland strategic operator.

I mean, Ggp is no different from any other share.

If the majority like it. It goes up.

ASX or lse.

And on the sensible side, well, somebody selling it down. Just now.

But not the going on investors, funds and insiders, buying by request £45m and before that, at 85/86p.

Share price is, eventually, , everything.

Sometimes, you react to your gut, on what you seen. I think this is the low.

Cryptic messages?

Worsen that nutter, Durett.

Ggp stands on its own, trying to make things of Telfer, and on its way, years off, to paying for Hav..

Very simple.

Best for that.

Amaroq seems to make a simple investment case. You either see them as prime movers in developing Greenland, and Nordic resources, funded by Nalanuq and its satellites, or you don’t.

You lot, by now, should have got to grips with bb board anticipation of rockets ( as used by some ) transpiring to be ground squibs ( as used by none )

All I’m saying.

Though being greenbinned, unread, don’t matter.