Member Info for Culpepper

Even if physically, or remotely believable.

But there’s them on here who sucks it up.

And regurgitates.

Lawdy, lawdy, either you is or is not a TRUE believer.

In Massah Day, and dem Ggp fellas.

Lawd a mercy

Cue comment.

‘lot’s of home truths there.’

I’m always fair.

Despite numpties, of which Monty has become one, for hopes of fame and glory, one of them diminishing others whilst attempting the impossible of persuading others thst bumming yourself is a reli@ble attribute.

And that’s why the price isn’t, just now, going up.

So there!

And don’t you forget it!

Some of you rather take leave of your senses. Don’t you?

People can see it, you know, who just might have some sort of interest in this goldfish bowl, for fun/dubious education.

It’s no longer even entertaining, Dippsy.

Anyway, you who post as Nappy.

I made truthful reference to them as posted before.

As for you, you bought, took a gamble, as you admitted when you should have sold.

So who are you, in the mix of the rest of us?

Jack your nonsense in.

I got £100k in Napoy..

Up yours. Gently.

Some people, some posters, got short memories.

I don’t.

My memory is pornograhic!

And the other one on here. Pis rule - OK!

As said by Hydro - I reply to me said, he wasn’t kidding anyone.

He was right, though not how he meant it.

Oh.

And noswej, ‘nasal’ wonders whether drilling results might help?

There you go.

On this board, if you remember, there were those ( the leaders, known to you ) saying the Aussies know their mining shares, it will rocket, Day and Co are like film stars. Bring it on. Hooray.

All balls, wasn’t it?

Now some prats want to argue about AI.

Anyway, for want of better to say, when perceived as flagging ( it’s not really, just management ballsed up the IPO by subsequent, seen as lacking on future oversight of mined assets)

They have to prove again, not their individual expertise, but their ability to deliver on published outlook.

Ignoring AI, all got a touch of hopefulness about.

Things hyped on here, then expectations dashed, then they say, well, look forward to the next ‘catalyst’.

Time some packed it in - setting up extreme expectations.

Still with index buying, whatever it amounts to, even if it just ties up shares.

And optimistic on quarterly. If not, not too good, is it? That lot surely recognise that.

If you’re sweating over the gold price (don’t see why you should, necessarily ) for Ggp to make its way, then youre in the wrong share. Future AISC and all that, despite capex.

December well know more, on then floated future fundamentals.

Nobody needs to answer for me.

If the discussion has moved onto AI, well, there will be winners and losers.

And you use it as you feel fit, on their offerings.

I see no point in denigrating it, as some not investing in their choice of it, may do.

Funny old place,by the anverage, isn’t it? Roads and stuff, infrastructure sparse.

Guess why old Olafsson so often refers to Amrq as a (mining) infrastructure company. Going on boats, helicopters, rigs and the like. And Hydro power.

If so, following those quartz veins.

And ALS , as you know, have a lab at Nalunaq.

AI will come to more influence the future. And it’s not all garbage in.

You are advised, quite openly, to check it out, corroborate.

It’s another tool.

Cue comments.

And bearing in mind, it may be their capital input, and discussion, may have been fundamental to the decision to bring forward the processing plant work.

All the best.