Member Info for Culpepper

got to laugh, aint her, out the perfidities of the old bb ****e.

all the best.

Get out there then mental!

Listing on ASX

I think a summary of yours says the price will go up. On or after ludtin*.

Can’t do any harm, can it?

“Instead, I personally expect block trades at fixed prices to large institutions—especially pension funds—who might take 1–5% chunks. That’s clean, controlled, and in everyone’s interests. The market makers would try to lowball Newmont in open market drips.”

Pretty obvious, what I been saying, unless they want to stick the mockers on Ggp share price, for months, years, and own best returns.

They’ll take the opportunity to sell a bit helping old Day meet institutional buyers demand, or not.

By the way, I don’t mind old Dipper pulling his horns in. He’s learning things might not be as his own self - promotion now sees it, with a bit of experience.

I wouldn’t argue, how can I? I hope you’re right. Proof in pudding. Lots on here believing it, so you must be right. I suppose.

Old LTH Dip 666, learned his lessons though. Now even longer posts, thankfully no nursery rhymes ( though into Wendy Houses ), basically don’t know, but he’ll review, maybe, in time, sort of.

I don’t say they will, but maybe posters here - it seems to me they don’t want to mention - don’t take on board the longer term positive eff3cts of the possibility ofNewmont taking part in a joint offering. Selective posting.

I guess because some want to suggest a share buying squeeze.

To be plain, I think either way it’s positive, Get ride of them in som3 bulk, trade sells at no cost to pis, better in fact, or take it as their view they’ll make more by hanging onto their shares.

I mean, nearer term, you have to look at the prospectus @nd then see what Day achieves on application ( probably done ) from the institutions he might want to consolidate the price, as long term holders, and tappable investors.

Pi’s are along for the ( positive ) ride. As usual, on a progressive company.

It’s not about ASX, is it, beyond the indices that ‘ have to buy’.

Iis might get in on listing to advantage.

And 2hether they continue on market.

Pi interest is next.

Day will deliver price discovery. Perhaps with Znewmont. Price at a point in time, for what Day can get on an offer, if one is made — up to 2.5% of shares, not Newmont in the ev3nt they want to and Zggp agees.

And on it goes.

Sh

Who cares about all that. You’ll get a rising share price - or you won’t.

Daft, pettifoggery.

Why can’t you lot just wait for next up prospectus, instead of banging on on imagination.

Done to death on here.

Anyway, I seem to hog this board, as thinly posted as traded.

So, I’ll try to give it a rest - I can be repetitive, nothing like them all put together on Ggp board though. ( in which I have a few quid )

They repeat to the point of nothingness, on nothing new, - as others might read it.

Nothing wrong with M and Ms. Or dolly mixtures.

M and A - what Australia going through.

With what I anticipate as AISC, and having regard to the world class grades ( from what I read on these boards anything up to 10%, posters see as ‘high’. ) Doesn’t compare with this one ( so far ) No need to bang on about gold price, as others do.

They will deliver, seeing where they’re at, I’m sure, on Nalunaq and satellites.

It will support exploration, half the business.

Moreover, as first movers in Greenland, the aspirations seem reasonable at least, with 20% of future rare earths/precious metals there. It’s down to M and in Australia and such, with new entrants ‘drying up’. As inferred. And that seems to be reflected in what’s going on with Greenland. Gold rush? No. Forward looking on earthly resources? Yes.

I’m now looking, at a 2 year timeframe for the company to promote and begin to execute things in motion, with a boost from gold mining and revenue/supporting profit, at year end. Maybe as late as first quarter.

I hold all my shares. It has not been profitable in the shorter term.

Next up, should be old Archer. If he’s worth his salt he’ll be thinking beyond Nalunaq revenue/profit, which seems ‘nailed on’ in mining terms.

Unless there’s news/comment, I’ll no longer seem promotional on this Bb.

All the best.

The report https://wp-amaroq-minerals-2024.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2025/05/6.-Annual-Report-2024.pdf is a good read, as one might expect. Very aspirational too of course- including the possibility of applying their model to leverage synergies in wider Scandinavia and the Nordics. ( page 9 )

Yes Dip.

I do say punters should manage expectations.

I don’t think I’ve read anybody slating Ggp on here ( or the media.) So it won’t happen.

There you go.

Board has a habit of running away with itself.

Managing expectations is no bad thing.

And actually, I’m not as ‘worried’ as some seem on here.

I think it’ll go on, over time, and forgetting amateur accountants, to make a few bob.