Member Info for cryptochump101

No, it’s been established that EUA would need to find a sum of money. My own personal thoughts are that its the 26m figure, others believe its the larger amount. The only way they can raise that sum is via a sale of WK, a placing or rights issue, i dont see a placing as being a viable option personally

That matches my notes RandR

Hey sexy saxman, you claim to have been reading his posts for months yet you joined a couple of days ago. Seems odd, surely you havent been posting as someone else or have multiple id’s on here. Dont bother responding, its quite clear what the answer is

Where’s your evidence that Zelensky is a coke snorting money launderer?

i see stretch is still coming out with the same ****e as he has done for years, never once been correct though. they say insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

All trades are listed on LSE, unless its private a trade which is far rarer than most imagine.

Some interesting posts last night that show posters real colours, there really is some low lives on here

Beast, I’d check your information as your facts aint facting!

Thanks for confirming who the green coffin was, nice to see Trowtech is still fixated on CTC. The poor man needs help with his obsession.

You’ve called it wrong from the very start mug punter, you’re a bit of a joke figure here with your matalan suit and claims of “do you know I am”. Still waiting on proof your claim of me in a high powered job though, it seems you're struggling to find it. Just another figment of your damaged mind

I see the normally very vocal rampers are very quiet this morning, they do tend to disappear when the price drops i note

chess, can you remind me who was correct on this, was it you or spikey??? it looks to me that you were spouting ****e again, your posts are very similar in grammar with punter although im sure thats just a coincidence

chump, i'm not clutching at anything- i'm going off what the company said in its latest rns.

quote.." we are working on changing the trading currency from gbp to specific denominated currency units to facilitate brics investors to include eurasia shares into their portfolios"......now that seems pretty clear to me that these investors do not want to trade eua in gbp or are not allowed like many uk investors who hold accounts with ig/trading 212/fin spreads/city index etc etc.

naturally, yourself and spikey simply cannot grasp that these brics investors do not wish to use gbp or are not allowed with aix brokers/mms just like many uk investors - so you concouct a story that these investors are non-existant and if they were real they would be happy & allowed to buy eua in gbp without knowing if this is really the case.

we shall see in the coming weeks if spikey is right and there are no buys when the nominated currency goes live or if its just his usual 'bitter & twisted' opinion of hating & detestimg all things eua even though he has no vested interest in the company whatsoever!

One director holds shares, what do you think would happen if CS started selling his? Come on stretchy, you’ve been here for a good few years under multiple aliases, you should know the very basics by now

lse building dossiers on trolls, more ****e from mug punter. boiler room crew rampers should be concerned though and those using multi ids at the same time should be on the radar of any legislation.

The share price movement shows the market doesn’t believe the letter. I’m always suspicious of anything that’s “leaked” on Teiegram as it’s usually fake and created by unscrupulous individuals / traders / groups

Do you have a link to the leaked letter?

Not sure where you get the idea that the market gets them a day before, that’s not true

It does have the feel of placing being forward sold, however i dont genuinely believe thats the case here currently.i get where you're coming from though

fairtrade, if you choose to look at my history you’ll see where i think this is going, don't get sucked in by clowns like punter who’ll try to claim i’ve said this is worthless.

irrespective of profit, if i want to call out poor performance or the ****e posted by rampers then i have every right to. they just don’t like alternative opinions and try to discredit those with them. trading / boiler room scum are well represented here and always have been

Broxburn, this topic came up earlier today on another platform. The general consensus was that EUA would need to find $50m although my own personal thoughts were it would be the $26m amount. Either way it does raise to question where the funds will come from, possibly the bod are hoping to sell WK shortly which will give the company funding and perhaps declare some form of dividend to long suffering shareholders, alternatively they may be looking for an institutional placing. I dont think they’ll undertake a rights issue.

Today’s news raises a lot of questions for those who are capable of independent thought and understand some of the issues at play, for others it was just something to ramp without thinking about it