Member Info for cryptochump101

I’d say DB1 is probably correct in what he’s saying but not having read EUA’s Mem & Arts I’m unsure of the actual percentages required

I asked this question the other day:-

So do Q&M owe PJSC NBT money or used their shares as collateral hence they’re claiming their shares, or are they claiming that Q&M have sold the shares to them?

Does anyone know the answer to my question?

Raggsy? CTC? I’m lost, are these previous posters on here as I don’t recognise either moniker from my time here

MaB, what do you think is a realistic selling price if not 40-45p?

Panino, your prediction of final dividend is 30-40x current share price, that’s quite a prediction to say the least.

As for the name calling you can’t just call one poster out for it unless you’re going to call out everyone that does it. Bill & Wolfe are far from the worst on here

I noticed that too Bill, I just read it as he was hopeful we would get a full explanation in the next RNS as opposed to it being a statement of fact. Maybe there is more to it than I initially thought

so you’re saying that the minority shareholder of wk could allow a potential purchaser to begin work at wk and not advise eua, seems highly unlikely to me.

also it seems highly unlikely that the potential purchaser would commit funds to work there prior to a deal being agreed as the deal could potentially fail and they get no return on the funds they committed.

in essence, i think on this occasion you’re talking *******s

Highly unlikely the purchaser is funding the work unless a deal has been agreed & signed off, in which case shareholders should have been informed.

Similarly if the board have had a change of strategy and have decided to mine WK then they should update shareholders. Once again shareholders are left in the dark by the board and having to guess what’s actually going on, comms are so poor with EUA

Lucky Leno, I don’t even know what I’m thinking half the time.

So do Q&M owe PJSC NBT money or used them as collateral hence they’re claiming their shares, or are they claiming that Q&M have sold them to them?

The claim for Queelds shares hasn’t been finalised yet, or have I missed something? There’s no guarantee that PJSC NBT will suceed in their claim for the shares

What’s the running up that hill reference to?

Richard, in fairness the board don’t really take fat cat salaries, I’ve seen plenty examples of it on Aim but it doesn’t really apply here.

That has crossed my mind Wolfe, but it could simply be the potential purchaser & company just can’t agree on price & terms. Either way if someone new is taking up our assets it’ll need to be soon for this years mining season. 3 months on from our bod’s hopeful deadline of the end of 2023

I think Offler makes a valid point with the figures he’s quoted which are from official sources however we’ve been told by the bod that the DFS has added value to our existing assets but we’ve not been made aware of by how much. Any potential buyer still at the table will be aware of the increased value though. It’s impossible to value our assets without being made aware of the DFS contents

As I noted earlier, someone has put 50p in Mizman and he’s spouting nonsense once more. Taking George Galloway as a source of truth or news is laughable in the extreme, but not surprising that Mizman has lapped it up

As at today Queelds shareholding is worth approx £4.6m, would you spend £40k to secure ownership? I definitely would

Just read the RNS, I had no idea the claim went all the way back to 2018

Rayski, I think the word you’re thinking of is exponential but despite the gold price performance which has been stellar it has the net sum effect of zero with regards to EUA share price

lol, who’s happy? dimitryreacts posted that? fantasy story for sure, i see lenoman is defending it, why would anyone do that. it’s cringy as ****

Who posted that Bill?