Member Info for cryptochump101

I like to think the same but I do have my doubts after reading a post from Del recently that set out the timelines of certain events

TBOB, Which court case funded us and allowed us to commence operations?

The Queeld share dispute has no bearing on EUA, surely it’s between Queeld & another party with nothing required from us, or am I missing something?

EGM a for a subsidiary won’t be unimportant? It could literally be for anything big or small, there’s nothing to indicate either way at this point

The only full time director we have is CS, if we put a vote of no confidence in him then who replaces our sole full time director? CS’s interests should be aligned with ours due to his shareholding which I’m sure he would like to monetise before retiring so as frustrating as it is, I think we need to be careful what we vote on.

Isnt the old adage, sell in May and go away. Let’s hope it doesn’t ring true here

Pwlx, if we have sold some or all of the WK concentrate surely the bod should have updated us on that. They know we’re starved of information and this would have provided a bit of relief to shareholders in knowing that we are able to sell it as it’s been sat around costing us storage costs, never mind price fluctuations

Pwlx, Thanks for the response, I’ll give the idea some thought but it’s time the bod were prodded

Pwlx, interesting idea for sure although I also understand the concerns that Offler has highlighted.

How much concentrate from WK do you believe we have sold in monetary terms? If we start to mine in earnest at WK I’m still not sure we generate enough to make progress with MT, especially considering how long it has taken to (potentially have) sold some or all of the stores concentrate.

We could drawdown the Sinosteel facility as you say but this to me appears like it’s the boards last & unwanted route to take. CS has told us he wants to retire now, I can’t see him wanting to mine in any shape or form

I don’t recall reading anything where the bod stated they were lying low, there was a comment about low visibility of a sale when we gave up on the Rosgeo JV

Wolfe, neither of the two posters you mentioned ring any bells for me so must be from before my time here. I just got the impression that TT had been around a lot longer than their moniker.

Im confused, who do you think pubcrawl us? Tiffintip, who did you used to post as, you’ve definitely been here longer than your moniker suggests

Bill, can you remind me if the DFS was for MT or WK, I thought it was for MT from memory

Beast, how can you tell they’re rollovers? Serious question, I’m not doubting it but just curious how to tell on the future

Let1be, I read that thread you mentioned but I dont recognise the two monikers you advise were you previously. I recall someone you replied to which is Friendsp who I think was quite a regular poster but their profile is no longer there, did they get banned?

Great post Lovely Boy, it makes understanding of the satellite images must easier. Thanks for posting it

Agree that the company really should be making comment on what’s happening at WK and if the concentrate has been sold yet

Some interesting posts this morning, good news is potentially close

Beast, what do you mean by cash or securities movement for corporate actions?

“We should meet up” is hilarious. In the words of Ricky Gervaise, ooh you’re hard!

i did wonder that too wolfe, friday afternoon is usually the preferred time to drop a **** sandwich of a rns is it not?

Offler, heard of them ? I’m one of them, aren’t you?