RE: Has been and continues to be a costly wait24 Apr 2025 15:48
Bonkers,
I did remove you from filter in order to read your questions following the favourable follow up comments and your reduction from 30 posts a day.
I read through your posts from yesterday and today and still find you to be completely disingenuous.
It’s clear that you have an axe to grind against Harry / Kefi and I can only assume it is because you’ve have previously lost more than you can afford to here.
SAUDI SALE
Kefi advised us that they were performing a strategic review of our Saudi Asset at the end of last year and the reasoning behind it.
They have subsequently kept us informed with the Feb deadline for indicative bids, the updated resource, why they didn’t sell at the higher ownership %, the new licences, the new JV, the March deadline for updated bids, that they are shortlisting from a long list of interested parties and when they expect to have the process concluded.
They have also advised previously that Artar have the right but not the obligation to purchase us at Fair Market Value (What we would have received for the sale in an arms length transaction).
We have also received the Edison report which whilst paid for by Kefi, must be approved by Kefi. Therefore, it could not be released as it was if the February offers received were not within the 50 – 100m bracket.
You are perfectly entitled to your view, but as a reminder it is that : nobody is interested in buying our share, that Artar have already actioned the compulsory sale, that the price will be dictated by an external valuation and you have accused those on here who were saying numbers within the Edison range as living in fantasy / dreamland.
Your questions aren’t ones that Kefi can / will answer. We might hear that they are down to say a shortlist of 3, but I’m expecting an RNS on a Monday / Tuesday morning to simply announce the acquirer.
KONSO
You have asked Kefi whether it is wise to spend 500k on Tulu Kapi related items yet are this morning complaining that we have not started exploring on a licence area only received 4 months ago.
Surely you recognise that at this point in time funds are better spent ensuring full project launch (at which point they can be recovered) rather than on a licence area only just acquired?
You make light of us being an exploration company that’s not exploring, but in reality we are now a Pre Production Company and such activities must take priority.