RE: Saudi Sale28 Apr 2025 17:00
Bonkers,
I did agree with your post earlier today in that there does need to be further clarity around Saudi.
However, I also feel that such a shift in direction has to have more behind it than the appointment of Tulu Kapi's mining contractor.
I'm sure it will become clear over the coming months, but i did raise the below questions with Kefi this morning. I've had quite a positive response rate, so fingers crossed.
1. The RNS dated the 13th November clearly laid out the reasoning for the Strategic Review and sale of the Saudi assets. This included Prioritising it's majority owned projects, focusing on a large Ethiopian pipeline and that raising sufficient funds for Saudi is considered too dilutive.
How has the potential 23m injection into Tulu Kapi's pre-production costs changed the reasoning of the above?
2. The "Introduction to GMCO (March 25)" that is published on the website indicates that Kefi's annual share of exploration is $4.5m & that there is an upcoming equity component for stage 1 development this year.
Where do Kefi intend to get this money?
3. Should Kefi not be able to fund its share of costs going forward and with the increasing value of GMCO, is historic cost now a fair basis on which to base dilution?
4. The ability for Artar to force Kefi to sell it's remaining stake to them creates market uncertainty. We have no idea what it may be worth or when / if Artar may decide to implement this compulsory sale.
Wouldn't this be a good time to amend the JV agreement to put some protection around Kefi's interest?
5. As Kefi is now no longer motivated to sell its GMCO share, can you provide the approximate market value of Kefi's share at this time?
My view is that Harry needs to lose his hard on for Saudi, treat it as a 15% investment rather than a Joint Venture, realise and extract the value from it, focus on Ethiopia 100% and create a company that needs no further shareholder fundraising ever