RE: .4 Nov 2025 09:34
"I’m a friend of Willis, he introduced me to Vlrm in 2021, told me it was the future and all the potential it had. I was part of the TG. I raised a couple of difficult questions and was immediately insulted, attacked and banned from the group. Since then I’ve popped in and out on LSE, mainly to troll TG members but also to provide a counter balance to the insane ramping that takes place around this share. So far I’m correct and you’ve lost a fortune.
Ppanchol was part of your gang, we went head to head many times on LSE but I believe after the failed gsx acquisition he saw the light. He now pops in now and again to troll db and chimers but again, acts as a counter balance.
Crawshaw was a previous holder of Vlrm. Very early days I believe. Again, a counter balance to the ramping.
Golden god is comedy gold, very entertaining but also very knowledgeable. You could probably attempt to answer some of his questions but as you’ve previously stated historically “why would I share my knowledge, I know this company inside out” whilst buying at 60p….
Now, even if all of us were previous holders with a vendetta against valereum and seeking retribution for financial burns, is that not highlight of the poor performance of valereum over the last four years? By all means, using any of the BODs or pivots, provide an insight into what share holder value has been generated by VLRM? Or, if possible, give us a bullish argument for investing in VLRM now?"
^^^^^^
DB, this question has been asked, and answered, many many times. By all of us 'goons'.
Can you answer why you believe we should not post here without owning shares?
Sign In
Follow the stocks
