Member Info for crawshaw

@Broke_holder, take a look at https://securitize.io/

"Tokenised rwa platforms need to be totally ai driven"

Why?

"only VLRM have this"

No, they don't.

Just to be clear PP1, when you refer to the "totally ai driven tokenised rwa platform" umpteen times a day, are you referring to to the 'VLRM Markets' platform?

Stop spouting nonsense PP1.

Regulatory approval in El Salvador to develop a platform.

What about the myriad of already developed platforms that have regulatory approval? Here's just one, a little closer to home, with regulatory approval from the JFSC - https://www.jerseyfinance.com/the-tokenisation-of-real-world-assets/

Broke_holder asked genuine questions. As an investor, they're the exact same questions you should be asking Gav.

I haven't stated any facts that aren't included in RNSs thanks Gav.

"Just think it’s time to call out the made up carp that is constantly regurgitated in this group"

From PP1?

It's not a rumour - https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/SYNT/statement-re-potential-refinancing/17457081?showDisclaimer=true

Ignorance is bliss.

In your own words DB?

I've stated why numerous times, including this week DB.

What do VLRM do, DB?

Thanks San, I thought I made that quite clear, glad to know I did.

I don't think DB even knows VLRM are part of the APEX/AQUIS. Come to think of it, DB couldn't even tell you what VLRM actually do.

Why would be panicking DB? We don't hold shares, and you can't short VLRM.

What could we possibly panic about? Probably best to have a think before bashing away at the keys on your keyboard.

You okay Gav? You don't appear to be enjoying the ride so much as of late?

Gav, who sh*t in your tokenised cornflakes this morning?

"in effect the Valereum/QGP deal is underwritten by Lloyds."

Wrong, again.

"The collateral backing the Qualified Medium-Term Notes (QMTNs) is underwritten by Lloyd's of London."

PP1, you've repeatedly stated the deal itself was underwritten by Lloyd's. Don't change the narrative now.

Explain the relevance PP1?

The Royalty and Streaming Mining Assets provide the collateral backing the QMTMs, they are independent of the VLRM/QGP deal per se.

You can't harp on about a 'totally ai driven tokenised RWA platform' then subsequently try and convince everyone that the sole purpose of the 'deal' is for VLRM to gain exposure to mining operations and commodities.

You're making no sense whatsoever.

Jesus Christ PP1, you're as illiterate as Dom-Bella.

I'm off down the pub to drink a cold, crisp, tokenised pint of beer.

PP1, which part of what I said is incorrect?