RE: OTCQB VLRMF Approved5 Mar 2026 14:26
One more question Bash, - You've expressed sincere joy over PP1's theory in the TG, but it's fundamentally flawed. It'd cost less than 1% to tokenise an asset of that size, if it were to exist. That equates to under $50M
Do you agree with PP1 that it'd cost 10% to tokenise such an asset and, if so, what is your source?