Member Info for crawshaw

"Crawshaw I thought you said you wanted an adult debate."

I do. But until the little child stops replying to my posts despite me asking them not to, I'll abstain from posting.

SCB you're acting like a petulant child, stop replying to my posts please, I have no interest whatsoever in conversing with you about BOO, your marvellous holidays, your beautiful watch, or anything else.

You're embarrassing yourself.

You have nothing to add regarding the company, only deflection after deflection. If you had any knowledge regarding the fundamentals, you wouldn't be so heavily underwater here, and you certainly wouldn't be predicting a 650p SP by 2025.

Find something better to do with your life.

"what is your rationale for describing Boo as a minnow?"

Sub £2bn global revenue, negative EPS, growing losses, declining market share, vastly overpriced acquisitions, dubious business practices, and very little communication from the BOD.

Not to mention the fantasist cult-like investors who are so deep underwater they cannot accept any criticism of their beloved investment.

BFD, I'm still not sure why you're comparing Lidl to Boohoo, where has Lidl come into the equation?

I'm not going to reply to the child. I'm fully aware of both Shein's and Boohoo's latest report UK revenues, not sure how the child gleaned otherwise, just embarrassing himself as usual.

It's quite clear Shein's UK revs will outperform Boohoo's when their next respective y/e reports are published.

Leave the grown ups to talk SCB.

Go and polish your Rolex.

The UK is Boohoo's domestic market, Lidl are a German company.

Boohoo are a fashion retailer, Lidl are a grocery retailer.

Lidl sell exclusively in-store, Boohoo sell exclusively online.

I'm struggling to see the comparison?

"there's a bit [sic] wide world out there"

Then why repeatedly visit one tiny part of it?

If you're not going to add any diversity to your portfolio, at least add some to your holiday plans.

Yep, a fashion giant generating over $30bn annually is going to take the listing of a loss making minnow on London Stock Exchange's AIM, makes sense.

I was referring today, figuratively. Read as "in the current market"

Polinvest, I didn't suggest otherwise.

"Based on potential? Not enough?"

Not in today's market, no.

I'll leave this here, for all to see what an embarrassment you are. I won't be responding to you any further, as your skull is impenetrable.

crawshaw

Posted in: BOO

Posts: 3,229

Price: 36.42

No Opinion

RE: Challenge of the day.....Today 08:29

£3.3m for the first 66%

£269.8m for the remaining 34% (£161.9m cash / £107.9m in stock)

A further £54m contingent on Boohoo’s share price averaging 491p over any six-month period between completion and March 2024. (As if)

What do I win SCB? Hopefully not that awful Rolex you like to flaunt.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

southcoastbather

Posted in: BOO

Posts: 5,495

Price: 36.42

No Opinion

RE: Challenge of the day.....Today 08:41

Of all the people i didn't expect crawshaw to get it wrong.....

Hint.... IT DOESN'T.

southcoastbather

Posted in: BOO

Posts: 5,495

Price: 36.01

No Opinion

RE: Challenge of the day.....Today 10:11

Nobody has the correct answer then??

The amount actually changes daily.... Hint....

You've been proven wrong, by multiple people, and are now trying two twist it.

Just give up, and give up investing too.

SCB, that's the (wrong) figure you wanted and thus I provided. You stated it was correct, based on the current SP, despite me saying it wasn't correct.

I had already posted the correct figures beforehand, and you categorically stated I was wrong.

Don't try and change your narrative now, it's beyond embarrassing. I actually feel a little bit sorry for you.

Is your question aimed at myself or Hexam, SCB? You've quoted Hexam's post.

Hexam, evidently SCB has never had to worry about GGT, and I'm confident it wont be a problem for him in the future either.

"For accounting purposes, the number of shares issued is multiplied by the share price at the date of acquisition"

"It does not matter what the share price does afterwards in terms of the actual purchase price paid"

SCB, these are facts. This is how acquisitions are valued. You can try and disprove them, and provide a source, but "I'm right, you're wrong" and "I told you so" doesn't count.

Hexam, it's genuinely painful. SCB clearly hasn't had to prepare a set of accounts in his life, thankfully.

Like I said SCB, for accounting purposes, the number of shares issued is multiplied by the share price at the date of acquisition. It doesn't matter how you try and twist it, you're wrong.

You've swivelled from reporting the price of an acquisition, to CGT calculations, only you could do that SCB.

You're comedy gold.