Member Info for craigawilde

you dont note...."Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Enterprise has INDICATED", not stated, not guaranteed, just indicated, which is what governments and civil services do every day of the week!

Thanks, and that proves it not a demographic group. You want your way and no other, well you keep talking nice to the board, see where it gets you.

Napom your wrong, check your jurisdiction for the law. It cant go ahead as its a breach of contract with the Zim government.

If Noel ran a democratic group he wouldn't have kicked people out like myself. Reality is the group likes to talk to George through email with an occasional phone Call that Noel gets to hear but no one else in the group was allowed. (One rule for one another for everyone else) It would be nice if noel's group actually did something proactive but hey we can dream....

Strongman, in your opinion, how does RHA fund the liquidation of RHA and not do a placing?
Your previous rns does not cover the fact of a future event, which is what the liquidation would be, incurring accountants fees, legal fees, etc etc.

Really, so if option 2 of liquidating RHA is chosen, where was that money accounted for given its a future event?

As for blowing hot and cold, no, I used to support prem, but have lost all confidence in the board and senior management.

Are you really that stupid?

Why do a placing, because they need money to cover operational expenses and wages, or do you think they all get paid in sweeties.

JV requires RHA being sorted, whether liquidation or sign off, that wont happen for a couple of months, ergo need money to cover.

I recommend you read some business books

If anyone wishes to join the group please email premactiongroup gmail com

Minilots, whats your investment here? I am down well over 30k so to me as well, not exactly a big buy at all, but to the small traders who throw a grand here or there, then yes I will give you that.

The proof of the one sided argument here, is its been 4 years plus of nothing but down hill and missed targets and milestones.

Currently stand under 3% but I expect it to take about a month to get to 10%. We wont combine as there is a fundamental difference between the two groups on a specific issue, but like Brexit :)

However yes collectively I believe the two groups stand around 15% of shares in issue.

The group is primarily about bringing shareholder value, the strategy for that is not for a public forum.

To answer your question, I have more people joining every day, ergo the percentage goes up every day.

But then I dont expect to reach 10% before a couple of weeks, which have many more coming if next week things are not progressing to stated timelines.

I am fine and confident that in time the group will reach over 10%, and then action will be taken, not nicely nicely talk that achieves nothing.

Moving up oh what fun, more people who believe in the company and the shareholder group that does nothing but communicate nicely with the board, but fair to bring any action or shareholder value.

Whats the point in collecting 20% of shares in issue in a group,when the group fails to force any action, or create any shareholder value.

First you might want to find out what the group has achieved once accumulation of 10% was reached.

Doire, we cant him him to a official guidance from 10 months ago when the company at any given period until profitable is in a fluid state. I have no issue with the commissioning of the report. The failure comes in the way it was presented.

What we need, is what we have always needed, a plan, one that can be actioned, with milestones, financials, resource allocation etc.

This is one thing I will be pushing for, when we hit 10%, plans from the chairman, strategic and operational.

Start rha up to run tailings - Not as easy at it sounds, you will need resources, a crew to do it, running the mine has a significant cost per day, machinery will be required and again has a cost attached. - its not as simple as switch it on and run.

Sell part of circum, interesting idea, however we are on the outside, he has far more knowledge on time lines, but do to NDA's cannot be discussed. But thats not to say we cant sell a portion of the holding to fund us.

Group 2 will aim to remove GR once it collectively owns over 10% closer to 20%

Just repeating my post from earlier before it drops off the page - first milestone of 1% passed a while ago

Camp 1 - people who are worried about their investment and have lost faith / belief in the culture and stewardship at Prem & another Camp.
Craig is trying to collect sufficient votes to give the collective Camp 1 sufficient firepower to try and address this situation but the message will get lost in the sheer volume of posts.
If you're in Camp 1 how about not helping the message get lost in the noise of hundreds of posts - far more effective is something short, sweet and to the point, perhaps along the lines of .........

if (like me) you are concerned about your investment then please send your contact details and holdings to premactiongroup@gmail.com

It's the only message you need to post if you agree, many are angry and frustrated but as you witnessed in the webinar there is nothing that makes it easier than an incoherent voice.

Well there you have it, the action group (in name only) have failed to bring attention to the company of shareholder value. As such I am forming another group that will force action.

Please email premactiongroup@gmail.com to be included

Well there you have it, the action group (in name only) have failed to bring attention to the company of shareholder value. As such I am forming another group that will force action.

Please email premactiongroup@gmail.com to be included

Ok so at weekend I said I would give an email to create a real action group, with the aim of getting to 20%, below is the email address. If you want to join simply email with name, number and amount of shares.

Once a decent number has come together I will contact each person to give phone number and forward proof of holding.

premactiongroup@gmail.com