Member Info for Craggs

Issue of warrants

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CTEA/completion-of-cov-id-project-fki1gv3i9nstfqu.html

Precisely. They are trialling at no airports because that is not the product they have developed. CTEA have already trialled their product. I find it impossible to believe they have created zero contracts in the past two months. Surely they only need to release an RNS at significant milestones, and not every single time they win a contract, regardless of size or value?

I have no doubt I'll lose all my money purely on the basis of you holding a different opinion. Your anger is misdirected.

"...BUT requires authorities to trust test lab results from abroad".

"The aviation industry had hoped trials of new systems designed to cut travel quarantine times could begin as soon as tomorrow. But Government sources said ministers were instead poised to launch a 'taskforce' to study the subject, delaying hopes of action for weeks."

So, the trail has not even begun. There's no mention of how long it takes. Then there's the additional hurdle of the governement accepting the overseas lab results. With potential amendments at the end of the trial this could be months away for the travel specific app.

Meantime, we would hope that CTEA can get a foothold in their intended sectors.

Keyser Söze

"...the Company looks forward to providing an update to shareholders on such progress in the coming weeks." Taken from their last RNS, 3 weeks ago now. Hopefully, not too many more to wait before a update on progress.

since the completion of Onsite-ID, but no announcement of any construction contractors making use of the app. In the same time, there's been no announcement of any comapny or authority taking on the Covid-ID app. Considering the ergency to get these kind of products into the market. How long do we wait before there is serious concern? Yes, the Afrik-ID is on trial until the end of October, but that's only to assess the commercial viability. Sales would begin from that point. I'm getting a bit nervous about this company.

Yes, I am invested, thanks. It's interesting how you are trying to make me a villian by twisting my comments and your constant claims of negativity, just because I have asked questions about your's and other's "life changing" predictions. I'd love it, as much as the next investor, to pay my mortage off from one investment, but it's not realistic here. I guess if it echos enough though then it must be true? And now you're trying to get others to back you up and bully me. Such childish behaviour.

So you're finally explaining yourself and saying they are just examples of potential profit, irrespetive of the possibiity. That's perfectly fine, but there was no explanation of that with the figures you posted. Just comes across as desperate ramping and trying to mislead others. Thanks for clarifying though.

My post on the 24th June was a question. One that proved correct: the share price spiked briefly before dropping back down.

How about this negative quote? (Tues 20:25) "...I'll keep my dreaming to £5m-£10m with the RTO". I guess my hopes of my investment multiplying by 5 to 10 times is not optimistic enough for you?

Filtered.

How are my posts negative when I'm clearly hoping for a positive outcome? Besides, at leat they are realistic, unlike your tripe. Your resort to petty insults and no explanation to back up your ridiculous claims speaks volumes.

How does an RTO get this company to being worth £100m at a 10,000% gain?

Admittedly, they never gave a timeframe to their prediction, but I'll be long gone before this company ever achieves a £100m MCap. I'll keep my dreaming to £5m-£10m with the RTO ;-)

0.1p is highly optimistic. 1p is just absurd.

I'd say we're more likely to see 0.5p this week, but we're both just guesstimating.

The sp has behaved exactly the same it did in February on announcement of new significant shareholders. The only thing that'll increase the sp and keep it there is revenue. Until then, I'd expect any positive news to just spike and slide back down.

Yeah, think all the 0.012 trades are buys. There's just not enough decimal places on here to register it properly.

They've done the first bit, but they are continuing with the suspension.

QFI have released another RNS this morning.

Saw this on the BBC website posted on Firday.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52938660

With so may shares at such a low value. They should consolidate them 1:100.

In section 7 the "Position of previous notification " is often filled in so you can see if the investor has increased or decreased their position. The dates in section 5 on the 3 RNS reports gave it away this time.