RE: Trading Update13 Jan 2026 21:49
DM – Thanks for replying, I can see now that you are looking at it in ‘relative’ terms to the Balance Sheet that wasn’t clear in your first post, whereas I was looking at it in pure monetary returns terms. Both views have value to consider when analysing the situation.
Although, I’m not sure I quite accept your ‘sweating’ comment when today’s RNS states: “Gamma has a strong balance sheet and a high level of recurring revenues. It continues to generate significant operating cash flow…” and the net debt is nearly gone even after the cash acquisition of Starface and last year’s shareholder returns.
A couple more observations:
Looking in more detail at previous buybacks:
2024 – announced in RNS 25/3/24 for up to £35m, ran to 6/9/24 and stopped at £27.3m
2025 – announced in RNS 25/3/25 for up to £50m, ran to 30/6/25 and stopped at £45.1m
I’m detecting a theme here…
They didn’t explain why either of those two programmes were left short of the indicative totals, so up to £85m (there’s that number again) expected over 2 years but only £72m actually spent. The next two years remain to be seen if history repeats!
Also, the details in today’s RNS about buybacks and, specifically, dividends are more normally expected to come in a company’s Full Year results, as they have been here in March the previous 2 years. Pushing that out in a relatively brief TU at this point looks a little bit desperate to support the share price at it’s current lows (not in itself a bad thing, but still…).
However, granted, ‘redirecting’ from any dividend growth to support buybacks is perhaps a wise choice when the share price is this low and someone(s) still seems to be offloading?
16:52 " the price would likely be sliding back toward 880p. The fact it's holding suggests the big institutions believe the Board is serious.” – that's day one, the week is not yet over and there is now a pesky gap to be filled to 883p. And maybe don’t look at how the US markets closed tonight…;o)
I hope my future outlook is wrong and I’m genuinely trying to present a balanced view here but I’m struggling to find it, so the wider discussions today are welcome to challenge any bias.