Member Info for Corrumpo

It really doesn’t matter what you think. Your posts are unbalanced, so I don’t think anyone is giving you credibility.

If you look back over my posts, I used to spend half my time disagreeing with GoldGeezer! But why let the truth get in the way of your narrative, eh?

Banjo - no problem, we’re all on the same side at the end of the day, ie, wanting the share price to rise.

Toffee - I’ve watched this board for years. There’s no conspiracy, just a load of punters who want it to rise and express their views/disappointments/optimism in different ways - some positive and some negative, depending on their experience to date and/or hopes.

The share price is at rock bottom. Where are all these buyers who have been waiting in the wings? There aren’t any, just the odd gambler who sees it as a worthwhile punt for a few quid. If I hadn’t put in what I put in years ago, I’d definitely have a few quid knowing it could disappear.

We’ll probably all know our fate soon, or possibly some sort of restructure followed by a company statement about how great it’s all going to be in 2026/27 and the can gets kicked down the road for the 3645th time!

Hawaii

“What the bashers do not understand, or want to understand, is that the company will be here for many years ahead, the gold price will see to that, all that is needed is a relatively simple financial re-structure (debt is negligible in any case), new expertise on site & a change of management, it happens often.”

Mate, apologies, I had no idea it was this simple. Best you remortgage your house. Beg, steal or borrow whatever you can, and load up quick!

Banjo

You wouldn’t make much of a detective, would you. The wrong person would get convicted! I am not Trader465 or anyone else, although I do laugh when I see him destroying you on the other board.

I bought a good few shares years ago at a relatively high price. I hold those same shares today, and have watched them systematically fall due to the twaddle peddled by the board. It’s as simple as that. I got suckered in on a bunch of lies. The loss doesn’t affect the quality of my life, as I realised it was a punt, but it stings of course. What particularly annoys me is the way I’ve been treated by this company. I don’t know how many are relatively new investors who haven’t actually read the RNS’s over the years, but I have, and many have proved to be blatant lies.

I want this to fly so that I can recoup some money, but fear the worst due to the self serving dodgies running the show. As for this paid basher nonsense, it just shows how ridiculously deluded some can be. But, hey, we’ll all know a lot more soon. I would like nothing more than my pessimism to be misplaced.

A fair assessment. Every time it spikes you hope it will keep rising, only to find out the fundamentals aren’t there and the rise was purely on hope, so down again it goes.

But Hawaii, the stock has been going down and down, and there have been few significant buys, so the evidence is absolutely not there. The last big drop in price was nothing to do with what was said on here, it was as a result of a fiasco of an AGM. Nothing people say on here affects the share price a jot. But you’ve got in your mind what you’ve got in your mind. I’d say take advantage of it then, and mop up these basher-induced price drops! Ride on their coat tails chief, rather than moaning about it.

And anything posted about Angela List was just what was in the Ghanaian press. If there’s a message facility on here, send me a DM and I’ll tell you what I hold and my history with this bunch. FYI I am not buying or selling any more. I’m massively down and hoping they bounce back.

AIMS have probably been suckered into believing great things are just around the corner like we all have, which is why they have been patient for years and rolled things over. I imagine Priestley’s “1000oz a month from Jan 2025” nonsense was the last straw for them and they need to get what they can from any deal now, because they can see the board will just spout more jam tomorrow rhetoric if they don’t.

Okay, okay, I confess. I am a paid basher. Emma says the company haven’t got any money, so she gives me 10 Nectar points for every post. I’ve only got to do 126 more posts and I’ll have enough for a (small) plastic tub of Quality Street.

I feel I’ve let you all down, and I’m sorry.

Yes exactly. Toffee, fill your boots mate. Beg/steal/borrow/remortgage your house and buy buy buy! I look forward to you making us look daft, because it means I’ll claw some back too!

And what effect are these paid bashers having? Have you seen the daily volumes? They are the square root of naff all. That’s why your theory holds no water.

I do appreciate you hate any views which might, in your eyes, diminish the value of your holding, and that is what upsets you, but such views really really have no effect on the price. Surely you must see that it’s only the company statements that move the price? Things like Emma’s 1000oz lies last December, that’s what moves the price.

Multiple accounts? Absolutely people have them. You can tell if you look at the other companies they follow and they’re all the same. There was one who used to big up Bill Trew constantly under half a dozen different names. The bottom line is, anyone who buys or sells shares based on what no-nothing anonymous people on message boards say, deserves all they get. Personally, I bought based on what the company said, and that’s why I’m aggrieved. I was knowingly sold a pup.

GRL don’t have the money to pay bashers! At the AGM Emma was asked if they had enough money for Angela’s payoff and they admitted they didn’t.

People are just disappointed/realistic, in some cases, optimistic. There are next to naff all shares changing hands, so it doesn’t matter a jot what anyone on here says, good or bad. To think otherwise is utterly delusional. The share will move either way only when there is news.

Toffee

Who is saying they are here to save others? Anyone who buys or sells on the basis of what people (who know very little) on here say must be bonkers. I bought years ago based on what the company said, not on what anonymous people on messageboards said. And now I’m locked in on a classic ‘sh*t or bust’ scenario. As for this ‘massive buyer’ buying a few million at 0.4p, he’s hardly a high roller is he? Look at the volumes. And neither are people scared off from buying based on this board. They’re scared of from buying because of the state the company is in. A state not helped by lies from the CEO a year ago, a shambles of an AGM, and complete radio silence from the board.

Hawaii, I genuinely hope you’re right and that it comes good.

I don’t think many on here (apart from Goldbug Bill) have an agenda as such. They just express disappointment at losing money in different ways. The share price isn’t altered significantly either way by posts on here, only by what the company pumps out in RNS’s as to where they are. And time and again, that’s subsequently proved to be nonsense.

I ‘bash’ the company because I’ve got a fair sum in here and have had for years, and I’m fed up with the tissue of lies that they emit. If you want examples, just trawl back over the RNS’s over the years and I reckon you’ll come to the same conclusions as me.

No one is bashing it to mop up shares, as evidenced by the tiny daily volumes pointed out by another poster. If this was a goer, they’d be buying up big swathes at 0.4p not systematically buying up a million ant an time over many weeks. If it’s that good, it would be a bargain at 0.5p, 0.6p etc and they’d buy at that too.

We’re all just posting our genuine thoughts, be they positive or negative. There’s plenty of evidence to support the pessimistic view, and naff all to support the optimistic. 200-ish ounces a month production isn’t enough to do anything dramatic to the share price. Yet we get statements like “Production continues to ramp up” and “We’re on course for 1000oz a month”. I no longer believe a word they say. Am I not bitter as such, just very annoyed if I lose my money to dodgies rather than a company trying its best and acting with honesty and integrity, which I don’t believe they are. I believe it’s a power struggle to nick it for a song and shaft us. But…I genuinely hope I’ve got it completely wrong and we all make something!

Chris, the famed 1000oz a month statement by Priestley was a year ago, and was made purely for their own company agenda. As someone else suggested, maybe to pump the price to allow that other bunch who were owed money to get out. There was clearly absolutely no prospect of hitting that figure with the resources they had, and have. It was a blatant lie, so would not have formed any part of the strategy or reasoning as to whether to accept an offer or not.

That’s not to say there’s not decent amounts of gold there, or they wouldn’t all be fighting over some muddy fields, some tents, and a few rusty JCB’s. The big question is whether, when they do start to produce decent volumes (if they’re not already and it’s not being side-doored as per BT’s accusation) the shareholders will see any benefit, or whether they’re working on a deal to nick it all for themselves. There are no scruples involved here, if we benefit it will be purely a byproduct of a deal that benefits them.

Sorry, meant even the GRL website has gone pop!

Zero comms

Even the GRL has gone pop!

Chris

Look back over all the years of RNS’s and most of what was said has proved to be a lie.

Do you think saying, in December, that production would be 1000oz from January is just incompetence. It wasn’t achievable and wasn’t even close. She has huge experience in the mining world, not just some puppet CEO brought in to guess. She’s been there years and knows full well what that mine could and couldn’t do. That’s just one of many, many examples.

Anyway, I thought you’d sold all of your shares?

Listen, we retain a glimmer of hope by virtue of the fact it’s not yet officially gone, but it is the tiniest of glimmers.

No one on this board needs to bash the company. Can’t you see what a fine job of it they’re doing themselves?

Their tagline should be: ‘Goldstone Resources Ltd - By crooks, for crooks’

@boldicus Yes indeed. I reckon old Billy boy was up all

sorts out there. And despite there being enough gold for everyone, the nature of the beast means that he wanted it all. Don’t like sharing, do you Bill?

Another comment of his at the AGM “I know where all the bodies are buried”. Now I do realise he means metaphorically, and purely business wise, but he was again blaming issues on Emma that he actually presided over.

Bottom line with this shower is that there all sorts of shenanigans which have happened, and are probably yet to happen, that we’ll only get the merest whiff of, and only then if we’re really lucky. As I’ve said before, the spoils will go to whichever of them gets to nick it first. If PI’s get anything it will be a fluke.