RE: Redmoor16 Feb 2021 18:17
People keep saying cornush metals are far behind redmoor - i don't see it. Both cornish metals and strategic minerals are multi asset companies - the biggest immediate advantage that cornish metals have is they own their mineral rights - which is unusual in Cornwall.
They have 3 main project areas they are currently looking at (and possibly a fourth currently undeclared area) being South Crofty (Tin), United downs ((tin/copper/zinc) and Gwinear (Tin/copper), so they are heavily leveraged to tin and copper prices.
We have Redmoor (Tungsten/tin/copper).
South Crofty and Redmoor both have Scoping studies, which currently show redmoor with the better investment case, mainly due to the high capital cost at crofty, and the flooded working and urbanised environment making proving reserves difficult.
The drill result at United downs caused a lot of excitement- they can claim the highest grade copper intercept in the world last year, if tgat proves to be a decent structure, its looking atbore values of around $500 per tonne, which is quite frankly immense.
They have full planning permission to build a processing plant.
In short, Redmoor at present has the better investment case, with significant upside. Cornish metals has quite frankly huge potential upside- Crofty survived for years at crazy low tin prices, because it is a top quality asset and is today ultimately a shovel ready project.
I am invested here, not in Cornish metals because I think Redmoor could be a super project - cornish metals i am still thinking about. All I am saying is don't go believing Crofty is miles behind us, if the tin price does what I believe it may (spike to $50k/tonne), it is entirely possible that the finance may appear at crofty to start work immediately and we haven't yet submitted for any permits. If that happened people will be saying how did they suddenly get in front - they didn't- to date work started at crofty towards reopening in 2001 by different companies and a lot of background work has been done.