Member Info for Colourbounce

Given CC claim to be in dialogue with every 'lost' contract partner, they must have information on this. Anyone care to ask? I think my bridge is well burnt.

My big problem is JC is somehow now talking even more Boolarks than he's managed at most times in the past. The interim results presentation is frankly scary. He is referring to the Director of Distribution in Indias Ministry of Power as a partner, wtf! He is clearly starting to believe his own lies? Other 'partners' he had meetings with were at the National Smart Grid Mission, where they got excited about his new Opex model. This is basically another desperate attempt to sell without paying up front, a method that has not ended well too many times already.

Let's not worry too much, there's really feck all worth buying into here.

Unfortunately tony.s the SP will not Rocket with orders, as a normal company would, because this Joker has been less than honest for too many years. No trust will exist until revenue covers costs, continually. That is a very long way off.

There may be an RNS on Monday with JC saying apart from the fact he cannot land an order, or any income from existing, he really doesn't know why the SP is still tanking. Oh, and it's nothing to do with CC.

Just for interest craig, who is the code for , if it is one?

what the knob will do if CC actually land an order!

Make it up as you go along. I asked for that (fictional tonyj) post to be highlighted here again. You clearly cannot find it because it doesn't exist!

If you are going to continue to make it up, just be careful you don't cross the line. I know CC have made massive mistakes over the years, but feeding the daft isn't one of them.

Depends what he says next Sunshine.

Ok, CC have a business plan that is built on volume deployment in India. It is only EESL that are involved in this so JC has to talk to them, no orders have been placed so the business plan is still holed.
Now, you are actually saying JC has given you information that is not out as general release? Think very carefully.

Unlike you, I do talk to CC and have recently posted the text.
Did you think to ask how big that round table was in your imaginary contact?

Lol, just, please because I need to hear this, what is the reason you can't post it? Please, I really don't know why : )))

So, this has gone circa 80p to under 3, and you are happy. Clearly a yes man, with imaginary conversations. Care to post any content on what made you so happy?

I only asked one question, have you spoken to CC?

we could see transactions starting with a 1. Did you ever actually talk to CC tonyj? I know you claim you aren't a yes man, but history strongly suggests otherwise : )

when most shares can declare the pivotal point of hopeless banter. JC, it's time to bring on the clowns : ))

Once again, please READ.

' The reason we now feel we won’t meet market expectation is that we would need to be ordering in large volumes of components to manufacture goods, and don’t feel it is the right thing to do until orders are in our hands '

It's like spoon feeding a 2 year old.

Sorry Pedro, didn't understand a word of that, it was like a continuation of the Corbyn hour just now lol. Read my previous, they are not my words but from CC. Costs, if and when orders ever land, are very real and CC have to fund them. This isn't a free ride, you need deep pockets, and right now CC are giving a rather good Elephant impression : ))

So, what is their take on the inability to land these orders then tonyj? There is only one question needed right now, don't say you haven't asked it?