Member Info for CLSKBull

WSHP has next to no volume. Only 5077 shares traded yesterday and the day before 7705 which is nothing for NASDAQ. Far far less than 1%, and resulted in a 30+% move down. Until they release some positive news this isn't doing a lot. But the right conditions this could move fast.

Sounds that way, must not be a very good day trader. Never ceases to amaze me this sort of stupid post.

Yeah the low volume and low float mean wshp price can do anything. Plenty more room for it to drop further which would not be a surprise. Alternatively they could release news and it could fly.

Wcap shares could go to 0, or they could 10 to 20x. My honest opinion is that those that buy here will make decent money, however it might be a bit of a rodeo ride so don't expect a smooth ride!!

Magpie, is your understanding that the tradeable float is 1.33mil - due to lock ins - as per:

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/WSHP/key-statistics/

If so it's clear that any serious level of volume would move WSHP fast.

Thanks Cowbridge that's really helpful.

Ignore that I'm being thick - that was November where there was a spike just after listing, not on the video broadcast.

Interestingly the surge in share price on the 19th seems to match the intraday timing of the Bloomberg appearance.

This and the daily volume profile tells me that the the stock is largely unknown, but also that 1) John comes across well and 2) Has an investible pitch/story that the US likes.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2025-12-19/weshop-turns-shoppers-into-shareholders-video

https://x.com/WeShopSocial/status/2002106354916601966

Hopefully it is just a formality, there is nothing to suggest it isn't at this stage. If we got to April/May and nothing had been agreed then that would be a cause for concern and can appreciate this will put some people off until it is resolved.

I've considered the scenarios and it seems most likely that this will get resolved in a satisfactory manner. Hawk's existing investment in WSHP is a key support for an agreement going through. If Hawk demands payment then WCAP might be forced to auction off part of their WSHP at a discount, which would be bad for Hawks existing holding. The path of least resistance is maintaining the status quo and perhaps getting some options/warrants thrown in as a bonus to Hawk for their support. Both parties are aligned on WSHP being a success for their own success and I can't see any of them wanting to jeopardise this.

With this one it seems too good to be true so naturally people are looking for issues and fixating on them. However I think everyone will be happy to see this particular issue resolved in a timely manner.

US Fed chair Jerome Powell's term ends in May. Trump is due to announce a replacement any time between now and then (I'd expect it sooner rather than later). It is likely to be a rate cutting, money printing advocate to boost markets. This is the sort of environment that would be very good for the markets, and companies like WSHP. On the bear side we're due a recession and there are indicators suggesting thinks aren't going great in the real economy. However my opinion is markets will run hard in the coming few months and this is therefore the sort of company I want to be holding - I'm not interested in holding something like Greggs, will leave that to the Oak Bloke.

Article is valid if you want to look at worst case scenario. Of course everything could go really badly, it's part of investing, and worst case scenarios could come true for any of his best buy recommendations (Greggs anyone?).

He fails to consider best case scenario at all, which is:

Loan gets extended at current terms.

WSHP starts putting out positive news items.

Market moves risk on and sector moves north carrying this sort of stock with it and UK market heats up in participation.

WSHP kicks on with viral/influencer marketing and becomes the popular kid for a period and price heats up further.

We're all eating caviar and drinking champagne while Oak Bloke is sat in the gutter outside Greggs eating his sausage roll value deal.

The article fails to consider any of the above. If the reality is somewhere in the middle of best and worst case then we're fine.

These will be delayed trades that were executed earlier in the day. I don't know why they do it this way, but they often do this with larger sized trades - I've had it before several times on my own trades wondering why they didn't show - then they appear later like those you saw. The timestamp is not the real time of the trade in these instances.

Funny they offered to buy 2mil off me for 1.9 (I had to be careful not to mis click so don't think this is a good practice going forward!), but won't sell me 25k. Which tells me HL is out of stock. Guess we just have to live with this for the time being.

Might just be HL, which broker are you using? Still can't buy 25k on HL.

On HL I can't even buy 25k shares - pathetic - seems a mini shakeout for the nervous nellies to try and gather up some stock. As Vet says, we're waiting on news to reset the price.

It is also a fact that she said they'd be mining 1000 ounces a month, which they didn't, and oddly that target has now moved significantly lower for 2026, with high costs. The repeated visits by officials likely means they are looking for payoffs. I doubt many will be jumping in at this opportunity, as there are plenty of better opportunities elsewhere in the market. Hopefully you prove us all wrong and make a mint, but it's hard to see it.

Look at the chart it goes up and down. There's no reason for the move, tiny volume, storm in a teacup. Poster was just bragging they had a successful trade and will no doubt jump back in for a second dip.

Yep the most scattergun of updates, glad I got out of this. Still mixing up units to confuse the message. High all in costs. Targets all over the shop. They need to replace this idiot asap. Failing in a boom market as well.

HNY all! I did have some GST but sold it a number of weeks back, the suspension for a period was unforgiveable, followed by a raise to buy bitcoin (why???) suggested this was not a well run company. Win some/lose some.

Jumped into some WCAP this morning, a more simple play where they have assets of 10x their MCAP, they hold over $100mil of WSHP shares - there are some catches (otherwise it would be too good to be true), but seems decent risk/reward to me for a 2 to 4 x potentially.

Thanks Rebs438 that is helpful. Had a quick look into Hawk and it owns 968,459 shares in WSHP as you say. Seems to be a lot of Channel Islands interest in WSHP. My thought is there is no rush here and agree with your assessment that a collapse of WCAP would not be in the interests of Hawk (Part of Albany Trustees - https://www.albanytrustee.com/legal-regulatory-notices ) - unless they wanted to try and forcefully take them via default - but I see this as unlikely as I think WCAP would be able to finance the debt via other methods. So hopefully this gets tidied up sooner rather than later and gets out the way.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2048271/000149315225018478/formf-1a.htm

The issue is that it's wrong so often that you can't trust it and have to fact check the whole lot. It's like having a useless assistant where you have to redo all their work - or you just let them get on with it knowing that sometimes they'll screw up and you'll just have to live with it. For example the slop it provided there was nothing useful that you wouldn't have picked up reading the recent RNS. Points 3 and 4 were off the mark and could lead you to make a bad decision. Sounds like this isn't one for you no probs, you just watch from the sidelines.